.gif files are a poor means to provide instructions. I will not watch them.
You can replace them e.g. with videos. It’s even better to use text and static images.
What’s an entity?
In order to avoid conversations like this one, link to definitions!
What’s a type?
Type of what?
“Some secret security improvements were implemented”
4.1 Poor English. You can hire us to help you provide instructions and write release notes.
4.2 You’ve made what more secure?
“How you will see fewer zeroes on Board View!”
You can see that it’s useful to have us edit your writing.
Reply here! You’ll benefit more. I don’t care for Discourse.
or the fact that you confused discourse with manners
You talk a lot about quality of communication. But on the one hand you are offended by the lack of “formal quality aka use of language” and on the other hand you yourself give a rats ass about formality. Hmm… to me this is rather inconsistent (and kind of rude).
Be that as it may: In my opinion your post says more about you and your personal challenges than about Fibery and theirs
If you want to see a great example of impressive style and manners, just read Michael’s or Anton’s posts – they are a delight and a vivid and shining example of a humble and winning spirit.
Please let us pay respect to what these guys have achieved and the way they conduct their communication. They know very well about their own limitations but leading a startup in Belarus during a worldwide pandemic is another level of torture.
BTW: This post should not be the first of many verbal exchanges of blows – all to the contrary: I’m very much interested in the feedback you offer. But the way you do it, just results in the opposite of what you probably were trying to achieve – and that is a sad and unconstructive result. Let’s change that, ok?
Would really like to see history though of both Types and Apps - so we can see when relations are changed, etc. Really helps out tracking as you build a Fibery instance, which in a lot of ways is similar to building actual software. Additionally, on the Type / App level it would be very useful to leave notes when those are built out, so you can see later on why you did certain things. For example, I have many instances when I started with a one-to-one to relation, and changed to many-to-many. Now, I have to write notes to myself in another app to document the reason. Would really help if I could do this in Fibery. And given how important the build-out over time of a Fibery instance is going to be for teams growing with Fibery, I’m sure this is something many other teams would find useful.
I think on the fundamental level, the history of Types and Apps, and also Views I might add which is useful, is actually the request @Oshyan made here:
Question to team Fibery: Is this type of Log indeed “in dev” as that thread indicates? What we have right now is helpful, but both the the Entity-level activity, as well as the new Audit Log, do not show what changes within Types or Apps.
Audit Log for schema changes is almost ready, it does include all changes in Types (new fields, etc), but it does not track Views creation/deletion. Hope it will be released next week. Here is the intermediate result
Ok that is great to see Michael! Thanks for the quick response. And I have just posted again in @Oshyan’s original request re: having comments around changes. Perhaps you guys could think about that down the road - it’s really needed in Nocode tools, and nobody else such as Airtable, Notion, etc. offers that. So like with some of your excellent features such as references/highlights, whiteboard, etc. if you developed that you’d have another differentiator I think!
I think it’s fair to assume that visitors to this site will know what these terms mean. If not, I would argue that the onus is on the reader to find out.
If you visited a community forum for Excel, and someone talked about ‘cells’ and ‘worksheets’, I hope you wouldn’t ask them to provide definitions of what these mean.