Whiteboard representation of relationships

[Chr1sG]

I have been using whiteboard to show relationships between entities with some success, but so far it has only worked well if the relationship is one-to-many. If the relationship is one-to-one or many-to-many then I don’t see what I would intuitively expect to see.
What is the expected behaviour for the whiteboard if I am trying to show entities that are related in these ways?

[B_Sp]

Hey @Chr1sG, here is a post about basically the same thing you are talking about, so support this 100%! Also, since as you can see I had the same problem, would love to get an answer as this is a key piece of Whiteboards I was hoping to use, and I’ve basically abandoned whiteboards until there is an answer here…sadly I see your post has also gone ignored…

And @helloitse, great example of a situation where we could use some consolidation of requests around here!

@B_Sp

Hi guys, just curious if you had any thoughts on this or when it might be available.

I have noticed that when I draw in Whiteboard, I can create two entities that are in a Many-to-one relationship and when I convert the diagrams and connect, those connections materialize in the entities - that’s great! But it doesn’t work for one-to-one or Many-to-Many that I can see.

Also as a side note, it would be great if an entity had a link to a Whiteboard where it exists in the diagram…

Finally, Just wanted to relate back to this request as it’s also connected @AnadinX curious your thoughts on that one, thanks!

Hi guys, I’d like to ask if you could consider a aspect of Whiteboard where a parent entity could be viewed as an “empty block” or group around its children. Something like this: [image] This is an image I did in reference to another work management app, but the point is that the

“grouping” block would be the parent entity, with the “task” blocks the children. This is very useful for expressing software systems - tiers of development for example, or Master Features that contain many sub fe…