Would be great to integrate Linear natively with Fibery. This would allow us to sync issues made in Linear and create processes or documentation around them.
Hi!
Could you please share, some use cases, of what you’re using primarily Fibery for, what is living in the Linear, and what do you want to have in both places (you mentioned issues, but some details would help a lot!)
Ideally, this would work in the same way the Jira Sync works. We, like many other teams use Linear over Jira for product dev. An initial import integration would be great.
*e.g. linking user stories to Linear issues. Linear’s doc features are not as robust as Fibery, so being able to reference Linear issues within Fibery and build further relations to those specific issues would be insanely useful.
We have Linear integration in plans for Q2 now.
1 Like
Any update on this? Still planned?
@mdubakov I see in the Fibery public roadmap for the Linear integration, that as of now the “labels” field for the Issue type is not supported, but it COULD be implemented as a multi-select integration field.
Would it be a huge technical lift to include the “Labels” field for Issues? Or why is it not supported out of curiosity? I feel like it is a fairly significant field that a lot of people tend to use for categorizing issues beyond what is possible via the related databases (user, project, initative, etc.)
Please consider adding the Labels field for this integration, thanks! 
1 Like
We decided today that we will support labels as well.
1 Like
Well there ya go, thanks! I won’t ask for anymore fields, top priorities are handled
1 Like
Released today