That is exactly what I was thinking, funny I think @Illusory you have actually outlined exactly what Fibery is trying to offer with this current push for āProduct Teamā use case that we read about here, on the blog, in Reddit. I in fact think that the Roadmap they teased could become the beginnings of a tool that would in itself beat the likes of ProductBoard, ProdPad, Aha, Roadmunk, Product Plan, Craft.io, and other players in that space. I tried to suggest that in fact:
***I wonder if the Fibery team is able to capture these bits of context here and there, ala @Oshyanās suggestion around using the āQuoteā capability here in Discourseā¦
At any rate, I have spent a lot of time looking at those tools and a huge issue is you canāt really manage the basic work of a team in those tools - so you are again using āisolated toolsā which Fibery aims to āreplace and bring everyone together:ā
I think Fibery can easily trump those tools as a more comprehensive offering, Iād really like to see those users get in here and see what they would request!
I also think @mdubakov even hinted at Fibery doing what these tools do today:
So, āProduct Management,ā not so much āProjectā Management. That is the realm of all those toolsā¦and although I donāt really support Jira integration since I think Fibery should look at that as a competing tool and focus on strengthening Fibery first before building a way to integrate with something that could easily be replaced with Fibery, this integration already looks head and shoulders above the other Jira integrations that each of the tools I listed has in varying degrees. So again, Fibery needs to be in the same conversation as a Product Management tool alongside all the other stuff it can do like CRM, Software Dev, Project Management, Task Management, Support Ticketing, etc. etc.