Suggestion: šŸ›£ Canny or other alternative for roadmap/feature requests

That is exactly what I was thinking, funny I think @Illusory you have actually outlined exactly what Fibery is trying to offer with this current push for ā€œProduct Teamā€ use case that we read about here, on the blog, in Reddit. I in fact think that the Roadmap they teased could become the beginnings of a tool that would in itself beat the likes of ProductBoard, ProdPad, Aha, Roadmunk, Product Plan, Craft.io, and other players in that space. I tried to suggest that in fact:

***I wonder if the Fibery team is able to capture these bits of context here and there, ala @Oshyanā€™s suggestion around using the ā€œQuoteā€ capability here in Discourseā€¦

At any rate, I have spent a lot of time looking at those tools and a huge issue is you canā€™t really manage the basic work of a team in those tools - so you are again using ā€œisolated toolsā€ which Fibery aims to ā€œreplace and bring everyone together:ā€

I think Fibery can easily trump those tools as a more comprehensive offering, Iā€™d really like to see those users get in here and see what they would request!

I also think @mdubakov even hinted at Fibery doing what these tools do today:

So, ā€œProduct Management,ā€ not so much ā€œProjectā€ Management. That is the realm of all those toolsā€¦and although I donā€™t really support Jira integration since I think Fibery should look at that as a competing tool and focus on strengthening Fibery first before building a way to integrate with something that could easily be replaced with Fibery, this integration already looks head and shoulders above the other Jira integrations that each of the tools I listed has in varying degrees. So again, Fibery needs to be in the same conversation as a Product Management tool alongside all the other stuff it can do like CRM, Software Dev, Project Management, Task Management, Support Ticketing, etc. etc.

2 Likes