Happy New Year, everyone! Here is the modest first release of 2026.
Custom Database access
Introduced afew weeks ago, this functionality is no longer experimental
Quick recap: if the default set of Database access templates doesnât cover your use case, you can now define your own custom template. For example, to allow users to edit but not delete any Task:
Check out our updated user guide for more details.
Duplicate automations to other databases
Now you can duplicate automation rules and buttons to other databases. It can be time saving when you have similar databases and want to have similar rules as well.
Note that this action works with the âbest effortâ. For example, if there is a field missing in the destination database, it will be marked as Deleted Field in the duplicated rule, etc. Find Duplicate to action in ⌠menu for a rule or button and try it out.
I love this feature so much. Thanks for building it!
When setting a template to âNo Databasesâ, those were already granted this template still have access with the disabled template.
Wondering if thereâs a way to make âSpace Access Templatesâ as well. Not sure about the need, but might be useful. This would maybe allow a template for âView Architect + Data EditorââŚ?
Iâm a bit more confused about this positioning in terms of settings placement. This is a workspace wide setting (from my understanding), but is hidden inside database access. What I edit here, is by default shown on all databases, and it also shows all other templates, even the ones not relevant to the database i opened it from. Thereâs the database indicator showing which ones are from the one I opened and which one not. But in my mind if these are global settings, it makes sense to be in the setting page. I think. Or make the database access templates per space (like how entity access is defined per database), then put in the space settings. Not sure about best way, but I think itâs a bit confusing at the moment to new architects.
Cool new automation duplication! Showing the name of the broken field would be helpful for relinking.
Like the new design of the collections. Looking forward to the new branding in general!!
Also I noticed a new dot indicator when filters and sort are on. Neat!
Making a template unavailable for a certain Database doesnât revoke existing access, it only prevents sharers from using the template in the future.
The Space level is trickier, since ideally youâd want to specify not only access to the Space itself but to each Database of the Space â similar to how you extend access via relations on the Entity level. Maybe weâll get there, but itâs unlikely in the next year. As usual, depends on the demand â so far we havenât seen much.
We started with the settings page, but it just doesnât deserve such prominence. Custom Database access templates are quite a niche and rarely used feature, and we didnât want to introduce extra complexity to the settings because of it.
Huh! The more you know! Just learned that this is the same for entity access. Some popup here might be nice, maybe a question of âConvert everyone from this template to another?â Maybe?
True! Ideally this is the case and would be great. But if it started with the same access across all databases in the space (as space access currently works) + control over views access. That would already by quite nice. It would then replace the âShare without extendingâ with custom access.
Iâm wondering where the User database permissions will be. Maybe there can be a âPermissionsâ tab in workspace settings? Not sure.
But yeah, indeed itâs probably a niche feature. Just thinking about where it makes most sense from a âWhat does this really doâ perspective. Making the feature more centered around creating templates for single databases then the option to âShare Globallyâ or âMake available to other databasesâ, then it would make more sense to be in database access settings. Its a small thing, but could make a bit more sense with the placement. Not 100% sure though.
Edit:
Note that I think ideally it works the same as Entity level access templates. Set on the space level, then avaliable to all databases in the space.
One thing I didnât particularly like was the border around the entity views. I understand the intention is probably to make it clear which content belongs to which entity, especially when we have multiple entity views on screen.
I remember we previously had a background color approach without borders â that was interesting. Then later we had neither borders nor backgrounds. Now we have borders.
I think the background solution worked well. Alternatively, borders could work too, but perhaps not such a strong border. A more subtle border (like 0.5px or 1px with reduced opacity) might be better. I made a quick experiment in the inspector to test this.
Thanks for your feedback! This is specifically related to dark theme: borders are lighter there, while background color has a darker shade, creating a look that itâs only border without background. Weâre working on improving it in some future