And listing meaningless SaaS “certifications” isn’t posturing? 
We’re all fans of Fibery and want it to succeed and grow, so I would want to absolutely encourage more posts and feedback from anyone, as long as they’re respectful and constructive. If you feel that this topic crosses that line then you’re free to say that, but lets not discourage conversation on legitimate concerns.
As @YvetteLans has mentioned, the issue is less about how the feature exactly functions and more about the solution the feature is designed to solve.
Helping users focus and be less confused/overwhelmed by information that isn’t relevant to them is the goal of this feature, no?
Most similar tools offer that functionality in some form- whether it be via customized layouts on a single screen (like Jira and now Fibery) or via tabs/pages (like ClickUp/Monday/Notion/etc) -without the need of a high subscription tier, because it’s essential functionality of every planning/execution tool used by a team of more than 1.
If the custom layout was applied automatically based on a user/team role or some other complex logic, I could understand it being locked behind a bigger plan, but as it is now it feels like it should be core functionality to everyone.
Ultimately, if it was mentioned during development that it would be a premium feature (and maybe it was but I just missed it), instead of being launched as a premium feature after many of us had been looking forward to it and had discussed with our teams, it would be essentially a non issue.
I’m trying to help Fibery avoid the same issues that ClickUp historically has had when communicating with their community, which is one of the primary reasons we dropped them.
The “the feature you’ve been asking for and we’ve been hyping for months is finally here!” with the fine print of “oh by the way you can’t have it without increasing your subscription by 66%” really sucks.