If I copy a to-one relationship in a table and paste it, Fibery doesn’t actually copy the specific entity, instead it looks up the name and pastes the first entity from that database with that same name. What it pastes isn’t even restricted by the established relationship filters.
There are of course instances where you need a database to always have a unique name, in those instances this “copy” method wouldn’t be a problem. BUT there are legitimate instances where you don’t want unique names.
This is a huge hygiene issue in my opinion. I just realized this bug and now have to go through everyone in my company’s projects to figure out how much of our data is linked incorrectly.