I have been considering Fibery AI for my workspace but I don’t have the bandwidth for overcoming the learning curve at the moment. Are there any partners who specialize in Fibery AI and are open to small scopes of work?
1 Like
Interesting! This sounds like an area of friction that indicates some important work for the team to do since in general AI is often intended to - and in the ideal case achieves - more low friction, quick, “easy” results compared to non-AI approaches. E.g. “Create a workspace for me that does x, y, z” is faster/easier than configuring manually (in theory); “What were the action items of our last 10 meetings?” that successfully returns a list of all action items is a lot faster than checking each doc individually, etc.
So what is it that feels difficult to learn or understand? How might it be made easier, lower friction, a more immediate help to your work rather than another thing to have to learn?
1 Like
Same purpose here. I have client database. Sometimes I just wanna ask AI to set appointments daily for me based on some criteria fields
Two solutions I want are
- a weekly summary created on Mondays to give visibility about sales, marketing, and client services activities in multiple apps.
- on-demand summaries of what work has been done and what is outstanding per project. This is to reduce the time & effort required to prep for client check-ins.
I need Fibery AI to read specific records, their linked entities, aggregate and return insights. I don’t think there’s anything for the team to change. From what I’ve seen I need a combination of JS and Markdown templating and then further troubleshooting that might reveal database or behavior changes required to get the results I want.
I’m booked and I’m looking to delegate/outsource.
1 Like
Both of your respective needs sound somewhat different than the direction most of Fibery’s AI development has been in so far. Unless I misunderstand the goal, I think “Setting appointments” is definitely outside of their scope thus far (and I would guess will not be in scope any time soon).
Summaries seem within the intentions of existing Fibery AI, but getting really specific with not just which DBs but which particular entities to read is not yet (I think) in the capabilities. I do think that would be really desirable though, e.g. if the AI tools had access to field values and you could say “Give me a summary of all open tasks assigned to me, broken down by project”. Maybe that’s supposed to work already but my most recent tests (admittedly a while ago) didn’t yield good results. The formatting/templating is interesting, but I’m not sure how possible it is. I don’t recall if the AI functions are accessible via the API or scripting in general and, if they are, whether the data could be usefully formatted that way since AI typically returns large blobs of text.
Anyway I’m not the expert you’re looking for, hah. Just curious to get more understanding of what you were hoping to accomplish to see how it might map to existing or prospective features and functionality in Fibery.
2 Likes
I would much prefer to dive head first into Fibery AI but I’ll probably end up paying for Claude/ChatGPT instead and doing a direct integration.
1 Like
I run a gen AI specialized agency, and borderline obsessed about LLMs and VLMs, would be interested in hearing the specific - maybe we can do a call, DM me?
EDIT: The main issue with any kind of AI integration, is that unlike code you have to have a way to handle when they fail (about 5% of the time), but the problem is they can fail in very unexpected ways.