If I can get a three-day view in Calendar View, it will be better for a narrow screen monitor.
And other feature request here:
- In Calendar View, the Color fill the task card instead of just showing a bar on the left in the card.
- For multi-day task cards with specific time, do not only display them at the top; they should cover the specific time slots. Refer to ClickUp.
- The time selection for tasks can be in 10-minute or 15-minute increments. For example, 00:00/00:10/00:20/00:30/… or 00:00/00:15/00:30/…
- Portions of each day can be collapsed, such as displaying only between 08:00 and 22:00.
Very useful! Until the Fibery team has considered this feature request, you can already set the desired time interval (5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes or 30 minutes) via the Fibery Tweak: “Smaller Time Picker Intervals”, which is part of the Fiberflow Chrome Extension.
A small suggestion. Currently applying filters to list view (the best view available ) make it so that if the applied filter makes the parent item not visible, then the child is also not visible.
Use-case: assigned tasks:
If I am assigned to child1, but not to parent1, and I filter the view for “assigned = me”, then I will not see child1.
My workaround so far is a roll-up field on parent1 that lists child1’s assignees, and then create the filter that displays either when I am assigned to parent1, or when I am assigned to child1. But it’s a bit of a work-around and it gets harder to setup the more layers (paretn1 - child1 - subchild 1 -subsubchild1) you have.
My suggestion would be to have a setting that allow to more easily manage this problem.
Are you configuring the view with the child database as the top level, grouped by the parent db?
Or is it configured with the parent db as the top level, with the child db nested under?
Parent DB as top level, child DB nested under (sub-child nester under again).
Basically: Project > Task > Subtask.
Workspace map for project / task /subtask:
If you want to see the parent Projects for all Tasks which you are assigned, then try setting Task as the top level in the view, and then use ‘group by’ Project.
If you have a filter to hide empty Projects, you will (only) see Projects which contain a Task you are assigned, even if you’re not directly assigned to the Project itself.
Mmm, this only works for 2 levels though (Project > Tasks), but not for 3 (Project > Tasks > Subtasks). Also, when grouping the labels of the projects look ugly
Thanks for the suggestion anyway!
I don’t understand the problem here. you can have Tasks (grouped by Project) and then SubTasks as a sub-level in the hierarchy, no?
Interesting feedback. What don’t you like?
Mmm, I didn’t think of that. I guess this way of having levels and grouping them is a bit hard to comprehend for me, so I haven’t grasped all its potential yet
This is without grouping:
This is with grouping:
Maybe my comment was a bit too harsh. But I personally don’t like that when using “groupings” the “project title” is smaller than the tasks and subtasks. But I understand why it makes sense for groupings to look different than the simple herarchy.
Edit: linked the same image twice by mistake. Now fixed.