Users are complaining about filters being AND logical operators, for example:
Show me all football fields where:
Capacity > 5000; AND
Capacity <= 5000
Returns zero options, as you’d expect.
They want it to be an OR filter, so that when both are selected it returns a union of the two sets.
…but here’s the catch: every other filter relies on it being an AND to function properly, e.g.:
Show me all football fields where:
They sell food; AND
They have ambulant toilets; AND
They have emergency exits
..etc.
Because you can only pin top-level filters in the bar, this can’t work.
Does anybody know how to cheat it so that both behaviours can apply at once?
Chr1sG
August 25, 2025, 6:16am
2
You can use any combination of AND and OR logic for filters, and the quick filters will respect that.
Went to the docs before I commented; doesn’t solve the issue.
Because what I’m essentially asking for is the ability to pin sub-filters (i.e., conditions within a filter group)
I’ve had the same problem…
Pinning filters is nice, but they only work on top level filters and not within grouped filters.
Use case:
I’d like to pin the “Is Complete” filter inside the group.
[Screenshot 2025-04-30 at 16.57.00]
Using this combo is the only way i could find how to make a button to “Show all” using filters, without clunky language like “Only show incomplete”.
Chris’s suggestion there was pretty good, but I think it won’t work for your use case as it sounds like you need to pin all the AND filters as well:
If you need different pinned filters to work in different ways, (some or , some and ) it’s not possible now im pretty sure… ://
Chr1sG
August 25, 2025, 8:14am
5
Maybe I misunderstood the example given, which I thought required all top-level filters to be OR’d. This should work fine. If one of the top levels is a group (of ANDs) then it should still work.
Chr1sG
August 25, 2025, 8:16am
6
This is not possible I’m afraid, but sometimes you can rework your filters to achieve the same end goal.