I understand your excitement about PKM, but it seems like Fibery might shift its focus towards facilitating Collective Intelligence (CI), although this hasn’t been explicitly stated. The potential for CI in Fibery is hinted at with the introduction of ‘Fibery 2.0’, which emphasizes ‘feedback insight generation’ as a key value. This shift could significantly enhance smart organizational culture if Fibery becomes more people-oriented.
The structure of this Fibery Discourse forum was initially experimental, as outlined a few years ago: Fibery Community Restart. Considering the evolving focus, it may be beneficial to reevaluate this setup.
Difference between Community and Culture
It’s important to distinguish between community feedback and community culture. Developing a smart community culture is a strategic choice that requires a deep understanding of social dynamics. This approach goes beyond simply assigning community moderators and involves integrating careful design to boost engagement and cultivate collective intelligence.
Potential
Fibery’s development trajectory this year, particularly with Fibery 2.0, presents an opportunity to foster a smarter organizational culture that not only gathers insights through pattern recognition but also translates them into tangible cultural growth and innovation.
Collective Intelligence is more advanced than PKM (Personal Knowledge Management), TKM (Team Knowledge Management), and GKM (Group Knowledge Management) as it not only involves generating new ideas and solutions from group interactions but also establishing an intelligent culture that adapts, develops and implements these innovations effectively. This process highlights the importance of collaboration, open communication, and the continuous evolution of group knowledge and capabilities.