BTW, what are your top 3 missing things/features in Fibery? :slight_smile:

Top 3 at the moment: ad hoc formulas in views - or in fact at least ability to use ad hoc lookups without having to create a separate field. In our project we restrict number of creators, but still would like people to configure their own views (to be able to explore and collect their own insight…

[image] Pawel_Badenski: we restrict number of creators, but still would like people to configure their own views [image] Pawel_Badenski: We specifically restrict view management to small number of people It sounds like these two things are somewhat in opposition, no? Would it make sen…

[image] Chr1sG: [image] Pawel_Badenski: we restrict number of creators, but still would like people to configure their own views [image] Pawel_Badenski: We specifically restrict view management to small number of people It sounds like these two things are somewhat in opposition, no…

[image] Pawel_Badenski: that’s exactly how software version control works. You have collective code ownership with ability to see the history of who changed what when. I understand what you’re saying, but I guess I don’t see views as being analogous with source code. I can see why seeing the …

Ask me tomorrow and maybe it’s different! But tonight at 2100… ability to write dates in fluent formats (e.g. tomorrow at 7, 1h tomorrow at 1300, etc) ability to watch an entity (and not be assigned to it) ability to visualise permissions (currently a black box)

Have you taken a look at mu Tripetto SDK recommendation? If this was integrated, much in the way Viziydrop was integrated, it would be an incredibly powerful way to create interfaces and conditional logic in data entry. Many of us end up using apps like JotForm and Typeform just to get around the …

[image] Pawel_Badenski: I can go to them and ask what is the purpose of that column In general, I think a meta layer is important: describing what fields are for, how tables fit together, etc. I.e. it should be possible to make structures in Fibery directly self-documenting (i.e. not in a pag…

[image] Chr1sG: If this means something like ‘per-user fields’ then that’s a really interesting proposal :thinking: but I’m not sure it would be on the radar any time soon. Asana’s My Tasks view allows you to organize your assigned tasks in a way that makes sense to you. It’s one area that’d …

[image] ento: Asana’s My Tasks view allows you to organize your assigned tasks in a way that makes sense to you. Within My Space you can create views of Tasks (or any other data) in whatever way makes sense for you. I’m not deep into Asana, but I don’t immediately see anything that’s not pos…

Here’s my current My Tasks view in Asana. The board lanes (circled in orange) are private to me, and they aren’t part of the tasks’ public fields nor any projects. In Fibery, it seems like I can only pick public fields as board rows or columns. [My "My Tasks" view in Asana] Board lanes in Asana a…

Q: What are your top 3 missing things/features in Fibery?

Ideas & Features

Chr1sG November 5, 2022, 8:47pm 41

As a side note, perhaps this topic is of interest?

Topic		Replies	Views
🔮 Fibery roadmap for Feb-April 2023 News & Announcements	62	5601	June 22, 2023
References to Views as a way to emulate Embedded Db's in Notion Ideas & Features	22	4759	June 15, 2021
🔮 Fibery roadmap for July-Dec 2023 + previous roadmap reflection News & Announcements	44	4740	November 3, 2023
Fibery for knowledge management, what I desire Ideas & Features	25	431	May 8, 2025
Fibery feature wishlist Ideas & Features	33	1513	July 10, 2025

Q: What are your top 3 missing things/features in Fibery?

Related topics