Hi again, As I get into Fibery, I am seeing that it could be useful for my use case to be able to choose amongst all types in a given App when creating a related field in another type. What I mean here is let’s say I have a type I’ve created in an App “Counterparties” called “vendor”. In this App …

Wanted to bump this, and @Oshyan brought it up in another thread before I had a chance to! I’m going to leave my hastily written use case for Polymorphic in the other thread, but here’s a link to it for reference: https://community.fibery.io/t/seeing-closed-entities-grayed-out-in-search-dialog/129…

Ah yes, Polymorphic…funny I was thinking the last week how to add in some additional use case stuff to try to move that along. You’ll recall @mdubakov mentioned here that the work involved isn’t too complex: [image] mdubakov: Polymorphic relations are not so hard to implement, it maybe take ~2…

Thank you for the comment, it indeed describes the value well. Some comments from me: With blocks we gave this feature more priority, since there are things that can’t be done without polymorphic relations I seriously underestimated effort, it is much harder to do and it’s a significant technical …

I wanted to just let you know that I moved my vote here over to the request here: [image] Next iteration of Comments - Commenting when Resolving & assigning as tasks/reminders Ideas & Features Hi once more, I wanted to make some suggestions for comments as you guys evolv…

[image] B_Sp: Polymorphic barely showed up in the chart here: https://vizydrop-svc.fibery.io/svc/vizydrop/shared/drop/5f92f75b7f92dd2c10305d92 yet it’s the top category now that we have votes. I don’t see anything about Polymorphism in the chart at all.

I accidentally posted a reply here, when I meant to move it to a new thread. And although there is mention of it above, I wanted to just make a new reply here to make sure @B_Sp saw it was a reply to this topic. Will be more careful about which thread I am replying to in the future. :joy: [image…

Would love to get an update here guys. My team has come up on this again as we build out new areas with multiple levels. We are building some multi-level structures in a software system. Basically, three apps, One has 4 levels, the other 3. There structures are in turn connected to a couple of t…

I don’t mean to be the primary torch holder of those of us really eager for this feature, but since it is about 1/2 year since @mdubakov weighed in here, would love to get another update on the team’s thoughts around this. I’m aware we have a good deal of visibility into what you are working on rig…

I notice in the schema lots of fields related to “Mixins”. I assume that’s not something that could be leveraged for this purpose, or it would already have been done.

[image] Matt_Blais: I assume that’s not something that could be leveraged for this purpose, or it would already have been done. 'fraid not, sorry.

[APPROVED] Polymorphic relations. When creating relation, ability to have many Types from which to choose, and not just one Type

Ideas & Features

Topic		Replies	Views
Fields applicable to all types Ideas & Features flexible-domain	13	3544	September 7, 2020
🌰 Fibery major conceptual (yet) unsolved problems News & Announcements	33	1348	October 8, 2026
🐠 Fibery product report: February 2026 News & Announcements	14	402	March 13, 2026
Relationship properties Ideas & Features flexible-domain	42	3473	March 10, 2026
Video game studio hoping that Fibery is the solution! Get Help	47	4472	June 7, 2021

[APPROVED] Polymorphic relations. When creating relation, ability to have many Types from which to choose, and not just one Type

Related topics