Not exactly Chris, because if you look at his last statement:
the way I read that is he is glad he has full access to docs/entities, but earlier he talks about other aspects of lack of history:
Another example is in my own case, Initiatives that last more than 3 months. This is typical if ou track OKR’s, etc - they are often quarterly or bi-annually. But you can’t see past 90 days the specifics of what happened now unless you got a pro plan where ALL the users are charged for something this is probably essentially to a few manager types that might be on a team…
And I’ll add that it’s really interesting that in spite of your guys’ supposed “encouragement” of unfiltered feedback, you have put a target on my back to make a distinct effort to prove me wrong just about every time I post something these days. I’m pretty much brace myself to get somebody from the team jumping in after my posts to say how wrong I am. Really disappointing given how much I’ve tried to support you guys for years - I have been here longer than you! Would it kill you to acknowledge the full context of my post, that I am making a comment that others are echoing that some features that I think are key are now finding their way into the higher tier plan, and that’s disappointing?