Hi, I’ve seen that from one to many it is supported ( CHANGELOG: Apr 27 / My Space (official), Convert to-one relation field → to-many relation field ) What would be the way to change from “many” to “one” ? I have setup by mistake a few weeks ago a relation from Solution “Big Solution” to itself (V…

Released today [image] October 3, 2024 / maple_leaf Quick filters on relation and embedded views, Clean email body, Automations Script AI Assistant, and more Changelog In today’s release we added several improvements to recently released features and made a first step to …

There’s no way to change an existing relation in that direction, but you can create a new relation and copy paste from table view I suppose. Or you can write an automation that copies over the entities.

Thanks ! I succeeded with copy-paste from table view but afterwards I had several formulas and automations to update by hand. This would be helpful if allowed directly when editing the Entity Field, like changing from one to many.

Allowing changing from to-many to to-one is much more challenging than the other way, because it is not possible for Fibery to deduce which of the ‘many’ should become the ‘one’. There’s some gnarly UX/UI issues at play, especially if you wanted to convert m:m to 1:1

What I would suggest here is only to allow this change to to-one if there is only one value in each entity. So for the end user like me the process would be simply check and update the table so that each value is single update the relationship from to-many to to-one And I only suggest going from …

Change "many" to "one" in relation [DONE]

Get Help

mdubakov October 3, 2024, 11:58am 6

Released today

Topic		Replies	Views
Setting from one-to-one to one-to-many breaks the "One" side of the relationship too Bugs & Issues	3	57	September 5, 2025
Convert between "Add to list" and "Add single" when changing cardinality of relation Ideas & Features automations	0	12	August 27, 2026
Auto-linking via a to-many relation [workaround] API & Programming flexible-domain , automations	8	708	April 16, 2026
Many-to-Many relationship in the same type Get Help	6	567	May 22, 2022
Stop treating "to-one" relation fields like a red-headed stepchild! Ideas & Features	4	124	May 12, 2025

Change "many" to "one" in relation [DONE]

Related topics