To-many makes sense, but seeing as you can set the to-one side of a relation as required. Is there a reason you can’t set a one-to-one relation. If this was intentionally not implemented, I will change this to a feature request.
To-many makes sense, but seeing as you can set the to-one side of a relation as required. Is there a reason you can’t set a one-to-one relation. If this was intentionally not implemented, I will change this to a feature request.