# \#list-view

**URL:** https://community.fibery.io/tag/list-view/8.md

[Latest](https://community.fibery.io/latest.md) · [Categories](https://community.fibery.io/categories.md) · [Tags](https://community.fibery.io/tags.md)

---

## [\[DONE\] Issue: List View is too random and restrictive with "Show All"](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-issue-list-view-is-too-random-and-restrictive-with-show-all/8131)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@helloitse](https://community.fibery.io/u/helloitse)\
**Replies:** 7\
**Last updated:** [September 3, 2026, 12:47pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-issue-list-view-is-too-random-and-restrictive-with-show-all/8131 "2026-09-03T12:47:17Z")

</div>

There doesn’t appear to be a way to se the rules of what gets filtered out when Fibery decides there are too many entities to render and the view all option appears. This has become a thorn in my side for the past week.…

---

## [\[FIXED\] List View Search Filter gives no results when Show All is not clicked](https://community.fibery.io/t/fixed-list-view-search-filter-gives-no-results-when-show-all-is-not-clicked/10077)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [May 21, 2026, 1:58pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/fixed-list-view-search-filter-gives-no-results-when-show-all-is-not-clicked/10077 "2026-05-21T13:58:38Z")

</div>

Issue: In a list view, when you use search, you assume it searches all items in the collection. But it currently does not, when you do not first click Show all xx. The feature that causes the problem: default truncatio…

---

## [Allow Collection Views to Traverse To-One Relations](https://community.fibery.io/t/allow-collection-views-to-traverse-to-one-relations/9281)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [January 27, 2026, 3:54am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/allow-collection-views-to-traverse-to-one-relations/9281 "2026-01-27T03:54:03Z")

</div>

Feature Request: Allow Collection Views to Traverse To-One Relations Problem Fibery views cannot display collections from a related entity accessed via a To-One relation. Example: If Page.MainFrame → Frame, and Frame …

---

## [Unlink button (x) too close to field in list view item](https://community.fibery.io/t/unlink-button-x-too-close-to-field-in-list-view-item/10021)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [November 16, 2025, 12:31pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/unlink-button-x-too-close-to-field-in-list-view-item/10021 "2025-11-16T12:31:35Z")

</div>

The little X button to unlink a views list item is too close to a list item field. This causes untintentional unlinking, when either a button or a field arrow is clicked. This caused already a lot of problems with find…

---

## [Roting Loader Icon/Gear when a view is loading](https://community.fibery.io/t/roting-loader-icon-gear-when-a-view-is-loading/9878)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [October 24, 2025, 8:55am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/roting-loader-icon-gear-when-a-view-is-loading/9878 "2025-10-24T08:55:53Z")

</div>

With some nested field collection views (.e.g list views with multiple database) the list view taks 5 to 10 seconds to load. This is not only for new users but also for me confusing each time, since it currently shows as…

---

## [Entities were not found during add collection items](https://community.fibery.io/t/entities-were-not-found-during-add-collection-items/9395)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [August 10, 2025, 5:21pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/entities-were-not-found-during-add-collection-items/9395 "2025-08-10T17:21:01Z")

</div>

When I try to drag-drop a child entity outside of the parent, it is rejected with this error message. In this case I wanted to drag the summary to the same level as the Chapters:

---

## [When changing the DB source of a View, keep the rest of the View definition](https://community.fibery.io/t/when-changing-the-db-source-of-a-view-keep-the-rest-of-the-view-definition/4499)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Matt\_Blais](https://community.fibery.io/u/Matt_Blais)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [May 23, 2023, 9:52pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/when-changing-the-db-source-of-a-view-keep-the-rest-of-the-view-definition/4499 "2023-05-23T21:52:03Z")

</div>

When developing a Custom Integration, if you “edit” the integration app (i.e. make a change to the app’s schema), Fibery disconnects all the DBs previously synced from the app. So when you sync again, you have all new DB…

---

## [List View doesn't always group entities of same type together?](https://community.fibery.io/t/list-view-doesnt-always-group-entities-of-same-type-together/4034)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Matt\_Blais](https://community.fibery.io/u/Matt_Blais)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [February 22, 2023, 10:17pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/list-view-doesnt-always-group-entities-of-same-type-together/4034 "2023-02-22T22:17:15Z")

</div>

Is this normal for List views of multiple DB’s? It seems like usually entities of a DB are grouped together (when there is no sorting applied).

---

## [\[DONE\] Many-to-many relationships should be usable for levels in lists](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@jean1](https://community.fibery.io/u/jean1)\
**Replies:** 24\
**Last updated:** [May 6, 2022, 3:06pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624 "2022-05-06T15:06:55Z")

</div>

I have \[Product\] \*------\* \[Feature\]. (Features belong to products, but some features span multiple products; e.g. “2FA” is a feature of both the backend CMS and of the mobile app). There is also a \[Product\] ----\* \[Bug\].…
