# Views are a little confusing right now

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/views-are-a-little-confusing-right-now/9421>\
**Category:** Misc\
**Created:** [August 19, 2025, 9:45am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/views-are-a-little-confusing-right-now/9421 "2025-08-19T09:45:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RonMakesSystems](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/ronmakessystems/32/14122_2.png) [@RonMakesSystems](https://community.fibery.io/u/RonMakesSystems)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2025, 2:48pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/views-are-a-little-confusing-right-now/9421/6 "2025-08-19T14:48:37Z")

</div>

> [@Chr1sG](#):
>
> I have no insight into what the PdM’s thoughts are on Daniel’s proposal, but I imagine the idea is that users can create an entity view which is neither 1-column or 2-column layout, but is simply ‘view layout’.

But this can already be done, just create a new entity view and toggle away all of the fields except for one. Would need the ability to remove the Name field as well and you’re done.

What I suggest is instead of a new Entity View type, it is another Field type. A way to put context views as “fields” inside of the entity. (Not fields in terms of data, but feel like a Relation View).

More similar to this:

> [@Entity context lookup: related field lookup list of relations, not allowing filters and search](https://community.fibery.io/t/entity-context-lookup-related-field-lookup-list-of-relations-not-allowing-filters-and-search/9227/7):
>
> Maybe you want to vote for this:

> [@Chr1sG](#):
>
> Weird. I just tried and could embed any smart folder view, including mirrored ones.

And regarding this:  
Idk what we are doing differently:  
@Chr1sG

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/views-are-a-little-confusing-right-now/9421)._
