# Video game studio hoping that Fibery is the solution! **URL:** \ **Category:** Get Help\ **Created:** [October 9, 2020, 8:22pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/video-game-studio-hoping-that-fibery-is-the-solution/1059 "2020-10-09T20:22:33Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 20
**Author:** ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp)\ **Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 2:45pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/video-game-studio-hoping-that-fibery-is-the-solution/1059/20 "2020-10-13T14:45:30Z")
Hey thanks! Just for clarification to the community, I believe you’re referring to this post: > [@Polymorphic relations. When creating relation, ability to have many Types from which to choose, and not just one Type](https://community.fibery.io/t/polymorphic-relations-when-creating-relation-ability-to-have-entire-app-from-which-to-choose-and-not-just-type/425): > > Hi again, As I get into Fibery, I am seeing that it could be useful for my use case to be able to choose amongst all types in a given App when creating a related field in another type. What I mean here is let’s say I have a type I’ve created in an App “Counterparties” called “vendor”. In this App I also have “partners” and “customers.” My vendors in turn provide 5 key services, which I have in another App. I’d like to link each service to the vendor. These services play a role in my Fibery … Wanted to clarify as there is a lot of discussion about this around here! I would call that the “True North” post on the subject here in the community. Of relevance: @mdubakov edited the subject after I posted and added the “[Polymorphic Relations]” clarification in the title, and as you can see he also chimed in there. I continue to really hope for this, as an ongoing problem as you build out in Fibery - and Notion for that matter - is the increasing number of fields that you need due to every single relation requiring one. All the more if you want to use Lookups to add in information from “parent” relations, which I talked about here, as it’s becoming a big problem for me: > [@Display "Parent" Relations in Card view in "Collections"](https://community.fibery.io/t/display-parent-relations-in-card-view-in-collections/1032): > > Hi guys, I wanted to request a change to the card view to allow “Parent” relations to display like the “children” do in the “Collections” area. My reasons for this request: As I’m showing in the image now, if you want to see more info out of a “Parent” item, you have to add as many lookups as you need. So if you wanted to see the ICE score of an Idea, you need to add a lookup. If I wanted to further add that Idea’s status, then that’s another lookup. As I have been discussing with @Oshya… Finally, having you in here interested in features gives me even more reason to wish for some kind of voting here in the community. > [@Upgrade Discource Features to include voting, tagging](https://community.fibery.io/t/upgrade-discource-features-to-include-voting-tagging/938): > > This isn’t actually a feature request for Fibery, it’s for this community forum. A As Fibery grows and this forum gets more users, there are more duplicate posts in the feature request section. I’d love to see the voting feature here, so we can show our support for specific ideas. I’d also be useful to have tags to indicate which topics are planned, in-progress, and complete. At least, until Fibery has public & shareable views. wink I am starting to wonder a bit about what is the basis for prioritization within the team, as some features that we are getting lately don’t seem to be that high priority, while basics like Activity Stream, Date-driving notifications, and others, seem to have no discussion at all from the team and leave me to wonder how long I’ll be waiting on them. Without this stuff Fibery is not really suited for true Team Work Mgmt. Polymorphic is a great case in point: @Oshyan, @Chr1sG and I have had lively communication about this for weeks, but haven’t seen any discussion of it in from Fibery officially in Twitter, Blog, Reddit, and most importantly, actual responses here in the forum! Makes me wonder about Michael’s original declaration and whether Fibery still wants to do this. If not, I think they should at least spend 5 min and jump in here and tell us! Thanks for the support! --- _[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/video-game-studio-hoping-that-fibery-is-the-solution/1059)._