# Using backticks (code block) in markdown template gives issues

**URL:** https://community.fibery.io/t/using-backticks-code-block-in-markdown-template-gives-issues/8626
**Category:** Bugs & Issues
**Created:** [April 17, 2025, 2:44pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/using-backticks-code-block-in-markdown-template-gives-issues/8626 "2025-04-17T14:44:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Yuri\_BC](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/yuri_bc/32/8803_2.png) [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)
#### Post date: [April 17, 2025, 2:44pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/using-backticks-code-block-in-markdown-template-gives-issues/8626/1 "2025-04-17T14:44:14Z")

</div>

**Case** :

1. When using Overwrite a RichTextField in an automation,
2. and in the field backticks are used to indicate a code block,
3. the content of the code block is not correctly displayed.

**Example** :

Automation Action:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/3/3b4a89ca79863c2906a1f79cb69b0bbe4444ec3b.png)

Example output 1:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/1/1438191aa744dc69aa2cbd2e688376904480ee7f.png)

Example output 2, using the same automation, but different Meta field text:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/0/07888848e0f4682b903f6b2869b7b61ab7d2fe5c.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Yuri\_BC](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/yuri_bc/32/8803_2.png) [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)
#### Post date: [April 17, 2025, 3:13pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/using-backticks-code-block-in-markdown-template-gives-issues/8626/2 "2025-04-17T15:13:42Z")

</div>

I updated the topic text to more accurately document the use case.

* * *

### The reason why this issue is important:

When constructing prompts where content of referenced text or code is included, it is a recommended practice to use code blocks for that.

In my case I ran into this issue with this:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/0/0b6e3a3a776c1d03db91be0cc2b2174dfc9b8ac8.png)