# Tools for Teams to track **URL:** \ **Category:** Tools\ **Created:** [August 4, 2021, 8:43am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876 "2021-08-04T08:43:22Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 10\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [August 4, 2021, 8:43am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/1 "2021-08-04T08:43:23Z")
Here is a list of tools for teams I personally like: ## Notion > **[The AI workspace that works for you. | Notion](https://www.notion.so/)** > > Build custom agents, search across all your apps, and automate busywork. The AI workspace where teams get more done, faster. Notion is a leader in this space so far. Sure, it has some problems, like poor connections between databases and poor backlinks. But overall Notion is moving in the right direction as a tool and as a company. They have pretty good chances to fulfill their mission (if they’ll re-write backend, maybe they already did it, not sure :). ## Innos Note [https://innos.io/?s=t](https://innos.io/?s=t) Multi-panel navigation works like a charm, bi-directional links are already solid and transclusions are there! Data organization is not so good. Discussions are quite useless. Interesting tool for knowledge sharing! ## Clarity [https://www.clarity.so/](https://www.clarity.so/) Looks interesting, a mix of Notion+Roam+Linear. Two-panel navigation is nice. Speed is nice. Lacks databases. May fit small projects. But the project management side is weak so far. Note-taking and links are good though. ---
**Author:** ![v3j](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/f07891/32.png) [@v3j](https://community.fibery.io/u/v3j)\ **Post date:** [October 15, 2021, 11:03pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/2 "2021-10-15T23:03:55Z")
Thanks, @mdubakov Michael for sharing these! I stumbled upon Innos on Twitter and wanted to check if it was already mentioned here. Clarity.so even looks more interesting to me. Just curious, these are tools you personally like. But do you also use them? Or are they just sources of inspiration/ideas on building a better Fibery? ---
**Author:** ![Oshyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/oshyan/32/11431_2.png) [@Oshyan](https://community.fibery.io/u/Oshyan)\ **Post date:** [October 16, 2021, 12:18am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/3 "2021-10-16T00:18:01Z")
Delibr is also doing some interesting things: > **[Delibr - A document tool made for and by Product Managers](https://www.delibr.com/)** > > Delibr helps product managers and their teams become better at collaborating in their feature refinement process. Get a free trial today! ---
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [October 16, 2021, 7:26am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/4 "2021-10-16T07:26:37Z")
I try to review every new tool in this space. I don’t use them, just review from time to time to spot new ideas and learn from them 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [October 16, 2021, 8:06am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/5 "2021-10-16T08:06:39Z")
I checked it out. I liked some type of blocks, like Pro / Cons / Decision - they help to create better specs. Jira integration looks good. ![Screenshot 2021-10-16 at 10.48.46 AM](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/9/96776234303f619c58b459c1414f793cb1a93dfc.png) I disliked images insertion, they are too small and it makes docs harder to read. ![Screenshot 2021-10-16 at 11.05.02 AM](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/c/cd7337642521a47053f4cbf98fc06a3f188e080b.png) Overall nothing new so far, well-implemented block editor + Jira integration 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![Oshyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/oshyan/32/11431_2.png) [@Oshyan](https://community.fibery.io/u/Oshyan)\ **Post date:** [October 16, 2021, 3:58pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/6 "2021-10-16T15:58:09Z")
Yeah, exactly. I thought the idea of using bullets/outliner, but adding _unique types of bullets/blocks_ was interesting and cool. And the Jira integration as they handle it is nice, it’s Fibery-like as far as in-line linking and functionality. Indeed nothing truly new, but a unique take on productivity using a different mashup of current approaches. > [@mdubakov](#): > > I disliked images insertion, they are too small and it makes docs harder to read. This is where “slavish” adherence to bullet points/outliner becomes problematic, heh. One of the many reasons I don’t like strict outliners. ---
**Author:** ![a2say](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f05b48/32.png) [@a2say](https://community.fibery.io/u/a2say)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2021, 10:04pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/7 "2021-10-17T22:04:40Z")
The application cannot be accessed yet. But on the landingpage, the main features of the application are described. It is clear that this is not a competitor to Fibery. But, in my opinion, it is worth keeping an eye on him. They have non-standard ideas. > **[Patera - Dynamic Documents](https://patera.io)** > > An environment for teams to think, plan, and model scenarios in. By using excel syntax inside documents, teams and individuals can explore possibilities, outcomes and alternatives. > > It's like a spreadsheet you can read. ---
**Author:** ![a2say](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f05b48/32.png) [@a2say](https://community.fibery.io/u/a2say)\ **Post date:** [October 30, 2021, 10:07pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/8 "2021-10-30T22:07:08Z")
> [@mdubakov](#): > > Innos Note An interesting thing has emerged about Innos Note. It turns out that this is the development of the Lark Suite (ByteDance), built on their code base. So it is worth watching directly for the Lark Suite. The solutions tested in Innos Note can be scaled there. Bitables, Docs and Wikis in Lark Docs are interesting right now. ---
**Author:** ![a2say](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f05b48/32.png) [@a2say](https://community.fibery.io/u/a2say)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2021, 12:18am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/9 "2021-11-01T00:18:10Z")
> [@a2say](#): > > [https://patera.io](https://patera.io) It turns out that there is already a working analogue of this application. Here you can already register and test live. > **[Reactivepad](https://reactivepad.com)** > > Reactivepad - documents made smart ---
**Author:** ![a2say](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f05b48/32.png) [@a2say](https://community.fibery.io/u/a2say)\ **Post date:** [December 20, 2021, 3:43pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/tools-for-teams-to-track/1876/10 "2021-12-20T15:43:52Z")
Another software to my personal “piggy bank” − [cloverapp.com](http://cloverapp.com) The bunch of Documents and Whiteboards with each other is well implemented. Each element on the board is also a block, just like in Docs. It has its own address and can be referenced. Working with structured data is still poorly organized. But there is a mode of joint work, respectively, they will develop the functionality. Team workspaces" are already available in the closed beta. — To understand the beauty of the solution, I advise you to read the article from the developer − [Clover – Space: Nature’s Tool for Thought](https://cloverapp.com/blog/space-natures-tool-for-thought) I looked through a huge number of services, nowhere is there full-fledged work with text on the canvas. Only in Clover.