# Thoughts on the "Fibery approach to integrations" article?

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107>\
**Category:** Integrations\
**Created:** [October 29, 2020, 12:31am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107 "2020-10-29T00:31:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2020, 9:59am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107/18 "2020-11-10T09:59:38Z")

</div>

There are many discussions about Votes, but to be honest I don’t like them. +1 has almost zero info. What I like is real evidence. So we want to export all discussions from this community and link them to Ideas/Features/ProductAreas, etc. Thus we will collect aggregated info from various sources (Intercom, Community, private conversations, etc) and there will be no misleading indicators.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107)._
