# Thoughts on connectedness

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-connectedness/1257>\
**Category:** Misc\
**Created:** [December 19, 2020, 7:46pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-connectedness/1257 "2020-12-19T19:46:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2020, 7:46pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-connectedness/1257/1 "2020-12-19T19:46:56Z")

</div>

This isn’t directly a Fibery topic, but I wanted to link to an article that I have written on [medium.com](http://medium.com):  
[https://chr1sg.medium.com/the-curse-of-the-med-tech-qms-e2f33aedb485](https://chr1sg.medium.com/the-curse-of-the-med-tech-qms-e2f33aedb485)  
It’s about the connectedness of data, in the specific context of product development of medical devices, where the process is heavily regulated.

The reason I am putting it up is here is because the thinking behind the article is what has made Fibery a hugely attractive tool for me for the work I do.

Also, the things that have been written by the Fibery team (as discussed here: [https://blog.fibery.io](https://blog.fibery.io) and elsewhere) resonated strongly with my own thoughts, so I hoped that anyone who was interested in Fibery might also find the topic mildly interesting.