# Suggestion: 🛣 Canny or other alternative for roadmap/feature requests **URL:** \ **Category:** Ideas & Features\ **Created:** [November 12, 2020, 5:15pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165 "2020-11-12T17:15:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 9
**Author:** ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2020, 11:37pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165/9 "2020-11-12T23:37:54Z")
That is exactly what I was thinking, funny I think @Illusory you have actually outlined exactly what Fibery is trying to offer with this current push for “Product Team” use case that we read about here, on the blog, in Reddit. I in fact think that the Roadmap they teased could become the beginnings of a tool that would in itself beat the likes of ProductBoard, ProdPad, Aha, Roadmunk, Product Plan, [Craft.io](http://Craft.io), and other players in that space. I tried to suggest that in fact: > [@Thoughts on the "Fibery approach to integrations" article?](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107/11): > > And re: your tool for presenting this, I’d go so far as to say you have a really great potential **feature of a public roadmap for Product Teams**. You should prioritize this! I can easily see with just a few tweaks how this could be right on par with Product Board, Aha, etc. tools that are huge in this space, and highly rely on their “Public-facing Roadmap” feature. \*\*\*I wonder if the Fibery team is able to capture these bits of context here and there, ala @Oshyan’s suggestion around using the “Quote” capability here in Discourse… > [@In Highlights, "Roam-like" inclusion of Hierarchy of Text Blocks](https://community.fibery.io/t/in-highlights-roam-like-inclusion-of-hierarchy-of-text-blocks/1135/6): > > I have another idea that I’ve recently found great value in as I work more with Discourse, and would probably help with your need as well (though you may prefer the “extended” quoting as you describe). And that is: quotes but with a button you can click to expand the displayed quote _in-line_ . At any rate, I have spent a lot of time looking at those tools and a huge issue is you can’t really manage the basic work of a team in those tools - so you are again using “isolated tools” which Fibery aims to “replace and bring everyone together:” ![Image 2020-11-12 at 6.29.17 PM.png](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/2/298dcd68ab733a70e9df8b89a1087c41fc79120d.png) I think Fibery can easily trump those tools as a more comprehensive offering, I’d really like to see those users get in here and see what they would request! I also think @mdubakov even hinted at Fibery doing what these tools do today: > [@CHANGELOG: November 12 / True "No Access" permissions, Jira integration](https://community.fibery.io/t/changelog-november-12-true-no-access-permissions-jira-integration/1160/1): > > You can gently try Jira integration. Import Projects, Versions, Issues, Statuses and Users. The main use case is to do Product Management in Fibery and link Issues from Jira to Features and Products in Fibery So, “Product Management,” not so much “Project” Management. That is the realm of all those tools…and although I don’t really support Jira integration since I think Fibery should look at that as a competing tool and focus on strengthening Fibery first before building a way to integrate with something that could easily be replaced with Fibery, this integration already looks head and shoulders above the other Jira integrations that each of the tools I listed has in varying degrees. So again, Fibery needs to be in the same conversation as a Product Management tool alongside all the other stuff it can do like CRM, Software Dev, Project Management, Task Management, Support Ticketing, etc. etc. --- _[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165)._