# Suggestion: 🛣 Canny or other alternative for roadmap/feature requests

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Created:** [November 12, 2020, 5:15pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165 "2020-11-12T17:15:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Illusory](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/illusory/32/10403_2.png) [@Illusory](https://community.fibery.io/u/Illusory)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2020, 7:03pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165/7 "2020-11-12T19:03:37Z")

</div>

Thanks for the reply and quotes! I’d definitely like to add one last thing then for @mdubakov.

> [@Thoughts on the "Fibery approach to integrations" article?](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107/18):
>
> There are many discussions about Votes, but to be honest I don’t like them. +1 has almost zero info. What I like is real evidence.

I certainly understand where this is coming from. Although voting can help you get a quick view of popular features, it doesn’t give a lot of context or foster meaningful contributions or evidence to the requests.

On that exact note – have you considered [Productboard](https://www.producthunt.com/posts/productboard-2-0)? (I see @B_Sp suggested it as well).

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/8/888e8c31fd208dce6519587126574edb5d3c1977.jpeg)

**They have voting + evidence/context prompting built-in.**

> **[Vote On Features Customers Want Most - productboard](https://www.productboard.com/feature-voting-forum/)**
>
> Collect and validate ideas by curating users’ requests, upvotes, and feedback on a public facing product portal.

For example, I can go to their public roadmap, I can see everything labeled as so:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/2/2c2805a0fa1472898ba67ec7c72d6995d8c4e252.png)

Each category then has sections that can be configured:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/2/2b4ff66df681606dd1c8e151702197382a9302a1.png)

From here, I can see how many “Upvotes” there are and read the feature request overview:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/7/7b2e91b543c4b559a88dfba4c9cf540e372e65e2.jpeg)

> [@Thoughts on the "Fibery approach to integrations" article?](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107/18):
>
> Thus we will collect aggregated info from various sources (Intercom, Community, private conversations, etc) and there will be no misleading indicators.

[They integrate with Intercom, Github, Jira, email and more](https://www.productboard.com/product/integrations/)… so, [I believe you’d be able to integrate conversations](https://www.intercom.com/app-store/?app_package_code=productboard&search=productboard). Hell, maybe Fibery can do an official integration and pull in PB feedback to leverage Fibery features.

There are also may be features of Productboard that Fibery can leverage for their internal teams, and/or later implement into their own app.

All in all, I know adding more to the list, means adding MORE to the list, and the system F-Team has implemented is obviously working. More than anything, we’re ecstatic about Fibery and can’t get enough it.

Cheers

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165)._