# Suggestion: 🛣 Canny or other alternative for roadmap/feature requests **URL:** \ **Category:** Ideas & Features\ **Created:** [November 12, 2020, 5:15pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165 "2020-11-12T17:15:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 3
**Author:** ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2020, 5:39pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165/3 "2020-11-12T17:39:25Z")
Hi, I’m sure I’ll be just the first of my fellow esteemed power-posters in here to flag up the other mentions of this - very glad it is continuing to get support. Here is the very first request I’m aware of on this subject: > [@Upgrade Discource Features to include voting, tagging](https://community.fibery.io/t/upgrade-discource-features-to-include-voting-tagging/938/2): > > Love this request @helloitse, was going to in fact post myself something like this and I found it! A lot of the other up-and-coming tools out there allow the ability to vote-up features. Some have it in Discourse, off the top of my head: AirTable Asana Monday And ClickUp famously does this, but in another tool Canny and I think that has gotten out of control more than they bargained for… I agree we have dup requests in here, and may basic requests around things like “recurring Tasks” that … Which led to a very spirited discussion, and I think a lot of additional support, in this thread, which granted was not initially about this topic (my fault as I started the tangent 🙂). That tangent starts here: > [@Thoughts on the "Fibery approach to integrations" article?](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107/11): > > Michael, it’s always good to see you in here, wish you could find a few more minutes a week to jump in like you used to slight_smile - it’s always so good to see your comments. And @Oshyan as always appreciate your commentary, I have never been able to take issue with any of what you write! I think this is great to see these items on the roadmap. Really encouraging to see a lot of what I’m looking for in “Green.” And re: your tool for presenting this, I’d go so far as to say you have a re… You mention Canny, in fact I showed a screenshot of that being used to promote a Fibery integration on Integromat’s Canny board. I actually plan to write a few more points about this as I owe @Chr1sG and @Oshyan, among others, responses, but on this subject. But just to address quickly re: Canny, I would propose the Fibery team continue on with Discourse and integrate a voting function that is on some other Discourse boards: > [@Thoughts on the "Fibery approach to integrations" article?](https://community.fibery.io/t/thoughts-on-the-fibery-approach-to-integrations-article/1107/15): > > Here is how Monday and Asana, two tools that I’m sure have many, many users who would find Fibery superior, have set up simple voting using this exactly Discourse software: > > ![Image 2020-11-07 at 1.54.56 AM](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/4/4b3c86f15856817db220ef27f3a782a98d0da761.png) > > ![Image 2020-11-07 at 1.55.51 AM.png](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/4/45b731f1ebabb0453dd1fc668fa5d3bfeeafff48.png) > > I will remain hopeful that the team will give this some deep consideration, and thanks! More to come from me on this subject, but really glad to see additional support! --- _[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165)._