# Staging environment for API integration testing

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/staging-environment-for-api-integration-testing/6165>\
**Category:** API & Programming\
**Created:** [May 9, 2024, 4:05pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/staging-environment-for-api-integration-testing/6165 "2024-05-09T16:05:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vadim\_Reutskii](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/vadim_reutskii/32/9321_2.png) [@Vadim\_Reutskii](https://community.fibery.io/u/Vadim_Reutskii)\
**Post date:** [May 9, 2024, 4:05pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/staging-environment-for-api-integration-testing/6165/1 "2024-05-09T16:05:28Z")

</div>

Hello, nice people!

I have a question: how are you testing your integration with Fibery via API? Do you use the same environment for keeping the main knowledge base?

We are a small startup (Remy Robotics). We use Fibery as a knowledge base, progress tracker and incidents management system. For incidents, we have integration which allows us to create, change status and mark them as resolved.

Before we used a separate workspace for integration testing with a free account but not a long time ago that became impossible as there is no possibility to create the workspace and use it for free.

I will be very thankful for any support and suggestions!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![interr0bangr](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/interr0bangr/32/8089_2.png) [@interr0bangr](https://community.fibery.io/u/interr0bangr)\
**Post date:** [May 9, 2024, 4:21pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/staging-environment-for-api-integration-testing/6165/2 "2024-05-09T16:21:56Z")

</div>

Why not just create a new space called “Integration Testing” with whatever databases you need to test with?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vadim\_Reutskii](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/vadim_reutskii/32/9321_2.png) [@Vadim\_Reutskii](https://community.fibery.io/u/Vadim_Reutskii)\
**Post date:** [May 9, 2024, 5:15pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/staging-environment-for-api-integration-testing/6165/3 "2024-05-09T17:15:09Z")

</div>

Good question! The main reason is that we generally try not to mix “production” credentials with the test ones. However, it may be a solution, you are right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polina\_Zenevich](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/polina_zenevich/32/480_2.png) [@Polina\_Zenevich](https://community.fibery.io/u/Polina_Zenevich)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 10:01am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/staging-environment-for-api-integration-testing/6165/4 "2024-05-16T10:01:34Z")

</div>

Hi!  
You can also create another workspace, call it remy-robotics-sandbox and move there all the structure (with no data) from your production workspace. There you can safely experiment.  
You can ping us via intercom - and we will be able to set infinite pro plan for that workspace so you didn’t have any limitations for experimenting 🙂