# Single Project & Task entities across entire workspace

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/single-project-task-entities-across-entire-workspace/3051>\
**Category:** Second Brain for Teams\
**Created:** [July 7, 2022, 9:27pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/single-project-task-entities-across-entire-workspace/3051 "2022-07-07T21:27:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cannibalflea](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/cannibalflea/32/318_2.png) [@cannibalflea](https://community.fibery.io/u/cannibalflea)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2023, 2:20am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/single-project-task-entities-across-entire-workspace/3051/6 "2023-01-25T02:20:29Z")

</div>

Yes, I think there is a really big missed opportunity in smart folders and lists by limiting grouping and hierarchies to only relation types (see also [Group by fields in hierarchical views](https://community.fibery.io/t/group-by-fields-in-hierarchical-views/3206)). Expanding grouping to other field types would really make for really interesting ways of viewing data.

This would be in addition to supporting [grouping in fibery table views](https://community.fibery.io/t/row-grouping-and-total-row-in-table-view/532) which seems to be in high demand (and a standard function in other tools, even something as horrible as SharePoint 😜)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/single-project-task-entities-across-entire-workspace/3051)._
