# Run Automation Rule Scripts and Custom Pages as a specific user

**URL:** https://community.fibery.io/t/run-automation-rule-scripts-and-custom-pages-as-a-specific-user/10978
**Category:** Ideas & Features
**Tags:** permissions
**Created:** [June 12, 2026, 10:56am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/run-automation-rule-scripts-and-custom-pages-as-a-specific-user/10978 "2026-06-12T10:56:08Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2026, 2:49pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/run-automation-rule-scripts-and-custom-pages-as-a-specific-user/10978/12 "2026-06-19T14:49:22Z")

</div>

> [@ID.000](#):
>
> 1. A user submits information through a form, and then a script fills many fields in the created task depending on what was submitted. The logic can vary a lot depending on the team, project, app, request type, naming rules, etc. In some cases, the script also triggers additional actions based on this context.  
> …  
> A user uploads files through a form. Based on file names and metadata, the script creates additional descriptions/clarifications, fills required fields, groups or separates the uploaded files, and re-attaches them to the correct tasks or related entities.

Maybe [this](https://community.fibery.io/t/branching-cases-in-automation-rules/2469) would be useful, if the challenges are mainly about the logic of the actions to be taken, rather than any problems with not having the right native actions needed to achieve the goal?

> [@ID.000](#):
>
> 1. Some scripts run on a schedule and check tasks against different combinations of conditions. For example, they can update statuses, add/remove people, change fields when related tasks are completed, or when secondary/linked work is ready.

Is the problem here that setting up the necessary filters (condition checks) is too cumbersome?

Overall, I’m not seeing things that can’t be done with Fibery automation actions per se, but I can totally imagine that scripting feels easier when the alternative is multiple automations each with its own filtering and actions that have formula-based effects.

> [@ID.000](#):
>
> now that webhooks 🤩 are available in automations

Indeed, perhaps offloading the more complex logic rules to an external tool (n8n?) might be an option…

To be clear, I am not trying to object to the request on principle, I am just aware that allowing scripting to run with variable access controls is something that is quite technically challenging, so I wouldn’t want to get your hopes up. If we can help with suggestions for alternatives, it might be the least-worst option 🤷

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/run-automation-rule-scripts-and-custom-pages-as-a-specific-user/10978)._