# Representing nested relations

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/representing-nested-relations/1405>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Created:** [February 25, 2021, 7:34pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/representing-nested-relations/1405 "2021-02-25T19:34:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cannibalflea](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/cannibalflea/32/318_2.png) [@cannibalflea](https://community.fibery.io/u/cannibalflea)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2021, 2:39am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/representing-nested-relations/1405/7 "2021-02-28T02:39:56Z")

</div>

Thanks @mdubakov, I know you have a lot of priorities 🙂

I was wondering if there will be a possibility to also look into representing the more complex entity relationships like this:

 ![org_model](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/8/85d483c761664883e0b8cfea7499bc460a844c70.png)

I am able to setup the relations and add the entries, but when it comes to setting up the smart folders, it seems having the “contact” entities at both levels (i.e. under “Organization” and “Organizational Unit”) is not supported:

 ![smart_folder_nesting_issue](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/9/9d6fbc486b5c2402b06797852acd19d7702fadef.png)

Is this at all possible?

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/representing-nested-relations/1405)._