# References reloaded

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/references-reloaded/4879>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Created:** [August 1, 2023, 4:40am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/references-reloaded/4879 "2023-08-01T04:40:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 72

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Egor\_K](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/egor_k/32/9710_2.png) [@Egor\_K](https://community.fibery.io/u/Egor_K)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2024, 9:05pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/references-reloaded/4879/72 "2024-07-30T21:05:23Z")

</div>

My use case is similar to [that one](https://community.fibery.io/t/relationship-properties/887) described by you. It’s not directly related to the highlight functionality, but my question is essentially a repeat of this one:

> [@Yuri\_BC](#):
>
> Does References 2.0 extend to the standard Relations between database items, do they also get fields

I haven’t found any _tools_ that provide this functionality in a nice way. However, this concept could lead to something similar to a knowledge graph/graph database to some extent. This would allow using Fibery as a more powerful data analysis tool.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/references-reloaded/4879)._