# Proposing development of a Fibery \<-\> Obsidian sync plugin (independent, open source)

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/proposing-development-of-a-fibery-obsidian-sync-plugin-independent-open-source/4514>\
**Category:** Integrations\
**Tags:** integration\
**Created:** [May 27, 2023, 10:36pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/proposing-development-of-a-fibery-obsidian-sync-plugin-independent-open-source/4514 "2023-05-27T22:36:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tpaktop](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/tpaktop/32/6394_2.png) [@tpaktop](https://community.fibery.io/u/tpaktop)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2023, 5:24am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/proposing-development-of-a-fibery-obsidian-sync-plugin-independent-open-source/4514/8 "2023-05-31T05:24:30Z")

</div>

@Oshyan wanted to check if you are aware of current limitation of fibery sync api. It’s one way only meaning that **ANY** content changes made in Fibery directly to obsidian data will be lost.  
The following should be preserved:

- New fields/formulas added to existing data entries from Obsidian
- Relationships in fibery
- Views and ranks in them in fibery

I do remember @mdubakov [mentioned](https://community.fibery.io/t/february-16-2023-jira-two-way-sync-beta-markdown-support-in-send-email-action/4000/4) that one day - we will get two ways syncing support. Not sure when is this one day coming though.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/proposing-development-of-a-fibery-obsidian-sync-plugin-independent-open-source/4514)._
