# Plans for end-to-end encryption or fully offline mode?

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Created:** [February 26, 2023, 1:50pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063 "2023-02-26T13:50:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NMan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/nman/32/6160_2.png) [@NMan](https://community.fibery.io/u/NMan)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2023, 1:50pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063/1 "2023-02-26T13:50:25Z")

</div>

Hi there

I love fibery, but I was wondering if there are any plans to introduce end-to-end encryption in the future, or a complete full offline mode (with local storage)?

Thank you

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2023, 6:18pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063/2 "2023-02-26T18:18:39Z")

</div>

Hi,

Fibery has encryption at rest and in transport, but I am not sure what you mean by end-to-end.  
Offline mode is unlikely anytime soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NMan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/nman/32/6160_2.png) [@NMan](https://community.fibery.io/u/NMan)\
**Post date:** [February 26, 2023, 7:15pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063/3 "2023-02-26T19:15:51Z")

</div>

Hi

I hope I am not wrong, but to my understanding the difference is:

- With E2E a server in the middle doesn’t decrypt the content. Only the source and destination can decrypt the message.
- With In-Transit a server in the middle does decrypt the message, and encrypts it back once it send it further.

```auto
End-to-End In-Transit
      ┌───┐ │ ┌───┐
Client│ │ hello │ Client│ │ hello
      └─┬─┘ │ └─▲─┘
        │ uryyb │ │ uryyb
      ┌─▼─┐ │ ┌─▼─┐
Server│ │ uryyb │ Server│ │ hello
      └─┬─┘ │ └───┘
        │ uryyb │
      ┌─▼─┐ ├────────────────────
Client│ │ hello │
      └───┘ │ ┌───┐
                   │ Client│ │ hello
                   │ └─┬─┘
                   │ │ uryyb
                   │ ┌─▼─┐
                   │ Server│ │ hello
                   │ └─┬─┘
                   │ │ uryyb
                   │ Client┌─▼─┐
                   │ │ │ hello
                   │ └───┘

```

- Transport encryption - Eavesdroppers cannot read message contents.
- End-to-end encryption - Eavesdroppers AND intermediate nodes cannot read message contents.

Does fibery being in-transit + at rest is the same as E2EE?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![itsu](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/itsu/32/1775_2.png) [@itsu](https://community.fibery.io/u/itsu)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2023, 11:32am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063/4 "2023-02-27T11:32:30Z")

</div>

Hi, Nman!

> Does fibery being in-transit + at rest is the same as E2EE?

You are completely right, those are not the same things.  
We are unlikely to work on that in the near-time future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NMan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/nman/32/6160_2.png) [@NMan](https://community.fibery.io/u/NMan)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2023, 7:41pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063/5 "2023-02-27T19:41:11Z")

</div>

Thank you for the answer!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AndreasHe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a3d4f5/32.png) [@AndreasHe](https://community.fibery.io/u/AndreasHe)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2025, 12:27pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063/6 "2025-04-30T12:27:32Z")

</div>

Hello,

I wanted to add here that the frequent request for onpremises solution is often simply caused by the issue of security.

What means; if fibery would be able to encrypt in the browser in a way the server data can not be decrypted without a personal key, for many the need for onpremises solution is not required anymore.

For sure for some fields it can not work in a database as relations require real data. But maybe text-areas may support that.

A standard like PGP would maybe be a good approach.

And if there is in addition an easy way to backup data daily, it is a plus.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JonathanJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a587f6/32.png) [@JonathanJ](https://community.fibery.io/u/JonathanJ)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2025, 8:54am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063/7 "2025-11-08T08:54:10Z")

</div>

What about integrating with ditto?  
It would make fibery valuable for industrial operations.

> **[Ditto - Industrial](https://www.ditto.com/solutions/industrial)**
>
> Ensure Consistent
Sync by Removing Operational Bottlenecks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JonathanJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a587f6/32.png) [@JonathanJ](https://community.fibery.io/u/JonathanJ)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2025, 8:56am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/plans-for-end-to-end-encryption-or-fully-offline-mode/4063/8 "2025-11-08T08:56:23Z")

</div>

for encryption I would like to see them use Nillion.

> **[nillion](https://nillion.com/)**
>
> Humanity's first blind computer for high value data