# October 2020 digest **URL:** \ **Category:** News & Announcements\ **Created:** [November 3, 2020, 10:27am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123 "2020-11-03T10:27:43Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 9\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 10:27am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/1 "2020-11-03T10:27:43Z")
> **[\#27. Reaching Level X in October 2020](https://fibery.io/blog/chronicles-27/)** > > TLDR: First integrations are released. Product teams validation is in progress. Hope to have Fibery 2.0 launch in December. We are still looking for Head of Marketing ---
**Author:** ![AdrianC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c68b51/32.png) [@AdrianC](https://community.fibery.io/u/AdrianC)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 10:44am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/2 "2020-11-03T10:44:18Z")
It’s great to see the progress with this system in such challenging times. I’m just wondering if there are any plans to implement a testing \ QA app for it? ---
**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 1:24pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/3 "2020-11-03T13:24:28Z")
Thanks for the Oct update. Quick comment: I think the GIF for ‘Set formula for the Name field’ is not what you meant to include - seems to be a copy of the one used for ‘New Search for # (insert entity) operation’ ---
**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 1:25pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/4 "2020-11-03T13:25:39Z")
Does this help at all? > [@Basic Test Management app](https://community.fibery.io/t/basic-test-management-app/1099): > > UPDATE: The official Test Management template is now available in the template gallery +1 I shared this app elsewhere in the Fibery community, but I figured I could leave a link to it here as well, so that it might be easier to find. Here are the type relations: [image] The idea is that a Test Case can be defined with a collection of named Steps (each with an Action and an Expected Result). When the ‘Execute Test Case’ button is pressed, a linked Test Execution is created (automatically a… If not, what would you want a testing/QA app to include? ---
**Author:** ![AdrianC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c68b51/32.png) [@AdrianC](https://community.fibery.io/u/AdrianC)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 2:27pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/5 "2020-11-03T14:27:10Z")
Hi Chris, Thanks for sharing that, the concept looks good. Is there any instance of a test plan included in the design, similar to within Targetprocess? It adds an extra step to the test execution where a Test Plan Run is executed and it contains Test Case Runs for each test case in the test plan. ---
**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 2:37pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/6 "2020-11-03T14:37:59Z")
I’m not a TargetProcess user (I requested a trial, but was told that I am not ‘enterprise level’ enough!) so I don’t know exactly how a test plan is defined. I’m guessing that a Test Plan is a collection of Test Cases, and when run, generates Test Executions for each of the Test Cases. Is that right? If so, then I think I could probably add that functionality. Is there an equivalent container for the Test Executions? Maybe a Test Run is a collection of Test Executions corresponding to a set of Test Cases that are in a Test Plan? ---
**Author:** ![AdrianC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c68b51/32.png) [@AdrianC](https://community.fibery.io/u/AdrianC)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 3:13pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/7 "2020-11-03T15:13:48Z")
Yes, that’s it in a nutshell. I have to create a Test Plan Run to start with, then execute each test case in the Test Plan and in turn execute each Test Step for each Test Case I will show you an example, I have 2 test plans under a development ( which is a collection of user stories / use cases ) Development / Test Plans ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/0/078378e639758f7931e835ce86875eed6604b70e.png) You can see 2 test plan runs for the test plan ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/d/d37c518a8b493f0aa7684aecd388d07788c7f65b.png) 1 test failed on the first run and 1 was on hold The 4 tests passed on the second run I didn’t set up any test steps on this example, I just wanted to indicate the test plan / test case relationship ---
**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2020, 3:26pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/8 "2020-11-03T15:26:58Z")
Perhaps we should migrate this discussion to the [App](https://community.fibery.io/t/basic-test-management-app/1099) page. I will reply there 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp)\ **Post date:** [November 7, 2020, 12:13am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/october-2020-digest/1123/9 "2020-11-07T00:13:09Z")
Adrian, good to see you showing some of the TP stuff directly in here for those of us not familiar with TP. I loved some of the way they handled stuff in there, in particular Test Case Management and with this example, you are also showing how they handled Hierarchical View, which I reference one of the many discussions right here below: > [@Suggestion for App Dashboard / Hierarchy View from left Menu](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-for-app-dashboard-hierarchy-view-from-left-menu/817): > > Hi Guys, @mdubakov would love to get your take on whether you guys might think about some view like this as a way to bring some more usability into Fibery for viewing an App Hierarchy? What I’m suggesting here is allow one of the areas in the App Home area, perhaps a new one called "App Dashboard, where you could display an existing hierarchy with much more detail from the one we have no in the left menu: I think a great implementation would be similar t… And the main reason I wanted to jump in here is I can’t help but responding to you @Chr1sG on this point: > [@Chr1sG](#): > > I’m not a TargetProcess user (I requested a trial, but was told that I am not ‘enterprise level’ enough!) so I don’t know exactly how a test plan is defined. My trials with TP took place over the last year and 1/2, and I have to say I was annoyed of late when they moved to that model, so you basically can forget about getting in there anymore! I think it would be great if some of us evangelist/power users of Fibery could poke around in there and see how @mdubakov handled some of the stuff highly requested, particularly by myself 🙂, as there are great implementations. Who knows what’s behind their switch and I’m not trying to start any controversy, but I had the very same experience a few months ago so I had to follow-on as you’ve clearly had the same - especially as you and I discussed earlier that you and @Oshyan may give it a shot (sorry can’t locate that thread it was probably off topic as we typically get to chatting around here)… Thanks guys!