# Nested Documents feedback (internal wiki, etc)

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/nested-documents-feedback-internal-wiki-etc/4141>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Tags:** rich-text\
**Created:** [March 16, 2023, 3:54pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/nested-documents-feedback-internal-wiki-etc/4141 "2023-03-16T15:54:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![antoniokov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/antoniokov/32/201_2.png) [@antoniokov](https://community.fibery.io/u/antoniokov)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2023, 6:01pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/nested-documents-feedback-internal-wiki-etc/4141/6 "2023-03-16T18:01:04Z")

</div>

> [@JoelH](#):
>
> Blocker for me: Haven’t found any way to use Documents for internal or external _ad hoc_ collaboration with non-paid Fibery users 😭

We are working on this right now with [Entity-level permissions](https://community.fibery.io/t/in-dev-entity-level-permissions/2163), although it’ll take a while.

> [@JoelH](#):
>
> As long as we cannot ad hoc collaborate with shared Documents for those of our contacts not yet using Fibery, I have a hard time seeing how we would incrementally adopt to more teams, and how to collaborate with some external vendors of ours.

As a part of our current plan, we’ll introduce a new kind of Users in addition to Admins, Members, and Guests — specifically to accommodate external collaborators. Inviting an outsider to work on a doc or a task should become frictionless. Notion and Google Docs do this well, we’ll take a page out of their book and put some Fibery sauce on it (not sure if the result will be edible 😅).

Retrospectively, labelling the current read-only users “Guests” has led to some confusion. However, the proper Guests are coming 🤞

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/nested-documents-feedback-internal-wiki-etc/4141)._