# Native JotForm Integration **URL:** \ **Category:** Integrations\ **Created:** [October 9, 2020, 8:17pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/native-jotform-integration/1058 "2020-10-09T20:17:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![helloitse](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/helloitse/32/498_2.png) [@helloitse](https://community.fibery.io/u/helloitse)\ **Post date:** [October 9, 2020, 8:17pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/native-jotform-integration/1058/1 "2020-10-09T20:17:03Z")
As Fibery doesn’t have a form view (yet) it would be nice if one of the early integrations was with a robust form tool. I say robust because, while typeform is popular, it doesn’t fill a number of complex needs like signatures or meeting scheduling. I think JotForm could be a great first form integration partner. ---
**Author:** ![Oshyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/oshyan/32/11431_2.png) [@Oshyan](https://community.fibery.io/u/Oshyan)\ **Post date:** [October 9, 2020, 9:29pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/native-jotform-integration/1058/2 "2020-10-09T21:29:53Z")
Yes, a form integration would be nice. I haven’t used JotForm, but sounds good. Heck, I’d settle for Google Forms integration as a start, since Charts already integrates with Sheets and I want general GSuite integration in Fibery anyway… ---
**Author:** ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2020, 3:42am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/native-jotform-integration/1058/3 "2020-10-10T03:42:56Z")
Yes that’s a good stop gap solution until we get movement on this: > [@\[DONE\] Form View and required fields](https://community.fibery.io/t/form-view-and-required-fields/680): > > I’m building an app for bug reporting that has multiple rich text fields (“steps to reproduce”, “expected behavior”, and “actual behavior”). I’d like a form view for this type that lets me enforce that users must fill out these fields in order to create a new a bug report. which also includes a 2nd request for Required Fields that I’m really hoping will come soon as that is a key piece for developers, and was one of the best parts of TargetProcess - there you could actually require comments before moving to a different State in the Workflow, very powerful! And to this point: > [@Oshyan](#): > > I want general GSuite integration in Fibery anyway… Yet another I am eager to see, too! Haven’t heard much about this lately in the blog, twitter, here in Discourse, so I hope it’s not too far out. As I already stated, not sure about Trello and Jira coming up before these…perhaps a ton of users were asking for those, but I don’t see any requests publicly! Would be great if somebody from the team jumped in and clarified for us - seems like haven’t heard from any official Fibery reps on these requests in an age, getting disconcerting… ---
**Author:** ![Oshyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/oshyan/32/11431_2.png) [@Oshyan](https://community.fibery.io/u/Oshyan)\ **Post date:** [October 10, 2020, 3:59am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/native-jotform-integration/1058/4 "2020-10-10T03:59:04Z")
> [@B\_Sp](#): > > As I already stated, not sure about Trello and Jira coming up before these…perhaps a ton of users were asking for those, but I don’t see any requests publicly! Yes, I begin to suspect that the forums are a little microcosm representing only a small portion of actual (or potential) users. They have Intercom on every page, so maybe most users are interacting directly and making requests and issue reports that way. This is where a public roadmap or feature vote/discussion board that aggregates all sources of feedback becomes really valuable. But… it’s their company and their livelihood on the line, so I do trust the team to be doing what is best for their overall success. If that does not immediately include my needs that is unfortunate, but perhaps understandable… > [@B\_Sp](#): > > Would be great if somebody from the team jumped in and clarified for us - seems like haven’t heard from any official Fibery reps on these requests in an age, getting disconcerting… True, it concerns me a bit too. But as long as releases continue regularly I feel happier to be here than with Notion or many other tools. 😄 ---
**Author:** ![Pagandai\_V\_Pannir\_Se](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/pagandai_v_pannir_se/32/387_2.png) [@Pagandai\_V\_Pannir\_Se](https://community.fibery.io/u/Pagandai_V_Pannir_Se)\ **Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 6:38pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/native-jotform-integration/1058/5 "2021-03-23T18:38:34Z")
This also our need , much more too , after all all android phone user with workplace too , migrate too better price , the few missing item for small office digital work place ---
**Author:** ![helloitse](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/helloitse/32/498_2.png) [@helloitse](https://community.fibery.io/u/helloitse)\ **Post date:** [August 6, 2021, 10:01pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/native-jotform-integration/1058/6 "2021-08-06T22:01:09Z")
I recognize I’m cannibalizing this idea here, but has anyone here used Tripetto? They have an open SDK and, thinking about the Vizidrop integration, I can totally see a similar setup with Tripetto as the native form builder solution. ---
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2022, 12:50pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/native-jotform-integration/1058/7 "2022-11-17T12:50:48Z")
Fibery has native Form View now > [@November 17, 2022 / Form View heart\_eyes, Timeline and Calendar relation Views](https://community.fibery.io/t/november-17-2022-form-view-timeline-and-calendar-relation-views/3543): > > Form View Finally you can create Form Views in Fibery and capture data from random people all over the world! Check the[blog post with more details](https://fibery.io/blog/form-view) and give us feedback to improve Form View in the next releases. Forms were in experimental mode, in this release we’ve added: Default values for fields Hidden fields (so you can set default values and setup some automations on top) Relation fields Form Icon Try to setup some Forms and give us any feedback y…