# Github Discussion sync **URL:** \ **Category:** Integrations\ **Created:** [April 11, 2021, 7:15am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549 "2021-04-11T07:15:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Holger\_Winkelmann](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/holger_winkelmann/32/1524_2.png) [@Holger\_Winkelmann](https://community.fibery.io/u/Holger_Winkelmann)\ **Post date:** [April 11, 2021, 7:15am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549/1 "2021-04-11T07:15:02Z")
Hi, Does the GitHub Integration support GitHub discussion as accumulated feedback channel similar to discourse or intercom? ---
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [April 11, 2021, 7:15am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549/2 "2021-04-11T07:15:45Z")
Not yet. Nobody asked for it so far. ---
**Author:** ![Oshyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/oshyan/32/11431_2.png) [@Oshyan](https://community.fibery.io/u/Oshyan)\ **Post date:** [May 24, 2022, 6:19pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549/3 "2022-05-24T18:19:08Z")
I would really find great value in having Github Discussions come in just like Discourse does. The API for it is here, I think: > **[Using the GraphQL API for Discussions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/graphql/guides/using-the-graphql-api-for-discussions)** > > Learn how to use the GitHub Discussions GraphQL API. Can we move this to a Feature Request? ---
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [May 25, 2022, 11:01am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549/4 "2022-05-25T11:01:01Z")
I moved it. ---
**Author:** ![Oshyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/oshyan/32/11431_2.png) [@Oshyan](https://community.fibery.io/u/Oshyan)\ **Post date:** [May 25, 2022, 3:10pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549/5 "2022-05-25T15:10:32Z")
Well, I can’t vote for it. 😄 I’m out of votes, so I try to remove 1, still at my limit, then remove 2 more for a total of 3 and still no? OK, I might as well stop destroying my old votes. 😅 Maybe my limit changed since I wasn’t here very much the last few months… (trust level). ---
**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\ **Post date:** [May 25, 2022, 9:20pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549/6 "2022-05-25T21:20:32Z")
Yeah, your trust level dropped, but I’ve manually re-promoted you 👍 ---
**Author:** ![Oshyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/oshyan/32/11431_2.png) [@Oshyan](https://community.fibery.io/u/Oshyan)\ **Post date:** [May 25, 2022, 10:31pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549/7 "2022-05-25T22:31:07Z")
Ah, thank you! Now I just need to see if I can figure out which ones I removed votes from. 😂 ---
**Author:** ![schorsch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e0b2c6/32.png) [@schorsch](https://community.fibery.io/u/schorsch)\ **Post date:** [September 7, 2024, 5:31pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/github-discussion-sync/1549/8 "2024-09-07T17:31:00Z")
it’s quite a shame. I understand priorities and workload is always a challenge. but we’ve got some 50-80% finished integrations that somehow lack going the full mile in order to truly and practically move such integrations into or leveraged with fibery. even with one-way, read-only sync and using github’s or destination-integration’s entity url/link… a lot could be done. if we had actual discussion/comments and down the line… exposed api code-diffs/discussions as well. obviously if long-term two-way sync were approachable it would become even better. maybe some sort of interface or contribution system to allow clients to contribute towards integrations for the community, exposing existing/official integrations would be a good option? I don’t recall what gitlab integration had missing. probably comments/disco and diff-discussions as well. seems to me the github integration is even older. I just hope this whole, somewhat (afaik?) “hardcoded”/streamlined PM focus and direction is truly the healthiest mid or long-term direction. 😕 maybe I just understood related blogposts wrong, not sure if that’s the actual conclusion. meanwhile I noticed there might be an option via linear integration. going to verify that workflow and hope it leverages twoway sync possibilities.