# \[FIXED\] Multiple Entity View in Pro Plan is a mistake?

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/fixed-multiple-entity-view-in-pro-plan-is-a-mistake/6501>\
**Category:** Misc\
**Created:** [August 12, 2024, 5:03am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/fixed-multiple-entity-view-in-pro-plan-is-a-mistake/6501 "2024-08-12T05:03:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2024, 5:49am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/fixed-multiple-entity-view-in-pro-plan-is-a-mistake/6501/17 "2024-08-20T05:49:14Z")

</div>

> [@B\_Sp](#):
>
> I’m not the only one expressing this opinion:

That’s a rather selective choice of post to quote, given that when the functionality of version history was explained, @Simon_JB followed up by writing

> [@vulcan\_salute New Pricing FAQ](https://community.fibery.io/t/new-pricing-faq/2243/12):
>
> Now that I understand the meaning, on the other hand I don’t see it as a strong digferenciator between plans…  
> I’m glad to know we will still have full access to the documents and entities

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/fixed-multiple-entity-view-in-pro-plan-is-a-mistake/6501)._