# Feature Request: Show "Timestamp" for Activity Log

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-show-timestamp-for-activity-log/6482>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Tags:** history\
**Created:** [August 6, 2024, 3:50pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-show-timestamp-for-activity-log/6482 "2024-08-06T15:50:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Illusory](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/illusory/32/10403_2.png) [@Illusory](https://community.fibery.io/u/Illusory)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2024, 3:50pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-show-timestamp-for-activity-log/6482/1 "2024-08-06T15:50:31Z")

</div>

Hi there! For auditing purposes, the “When” column is nice but it would be helpful to see the actual timestamp that an event took place. Assuming When is just a converted timestamp, can we also add the timestamp as a column?

 ![CleanShot 2024-08-06 at 11.49.19](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/5/5cdbe62350571debb6b9470d3be06eace770ccad.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grex22](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/grex22/32/10249_2.png) [@grex22](https://community.fibery.io/u/grex22)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 4:29pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-show-timestamp-for-activity-log/6482/2 "2024-08-07T16:29:23Z")

</div>

Funny, I just used the Activity Log for the first time today and I ran into this same issue. I like the “ago” phrasing for really recent stuff, but beyond that it gets a little unhelpful.

I like Timestamp as either a separate column as you said, or perhaps as a hover pop-over that would include the full date/time info.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 7:34am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-show-timestamp-for-activity-log/6482/3 "2024-08-08T07:34:17Z")

</div>

> [@grex22](#):
>
> or perhaps as a hover pop-over that would include the full date/time info.

But it already works this way.

 ![Screenshot 2024-08-08 at 10.33.25 AM](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/0/0ce57e6266d3da30962aea12883602ef53035598.png)

Do you really need a separate column @Illusory?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YvetteLans](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/yvettelans/32/6101_2.png) [@YvetteLans](https://community.fibery.io/u/YvetteLans)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 9:31am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-show-timestamp-for-activity-log/6482/4 "2024-08-08T09:31:21Z")

</div>

> [@mdubakov](#):
>
> But it already works this way.

Never knew this 😅 So maybe that’s a good reason to show the information in a separate column → to avoid questions from users / to provide the information more easily.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Illusory](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/illusory/32/10403_2.png) [@Illusory](https://community.fibery.io/u/Illusory)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 11:01am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-show-timestamp-for-activity-log/6482/5 "2024-08-08T11:01:22Z")

</div>

Didn’t realize that either! A separate column would be nice but I think being able to hover works. Still a bit challenging when reviewing important edits as you’ll need to hover over each one but is better than not having.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grex22](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/grex22/32/10249_2.png) [@grex22](https://community.fibery.io/u/grex22)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 2:45pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-show-timestamp-for-activity-log/6482/6 "2024-08-08T14:45:48Z")

</div>

Didn’t realize this either! Wow… You would’ve thought I would’ve tried hovering back before I recommended hovering.
