# Feature Request: Claude AI

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-claude-ai/6624>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Tags:** ai\
**Created:** [September 11, 2024, 1:31pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-claude-ai/6624 "2024-09-11T13:31:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Illusory](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/illusory/32/10403_2.png) [@Illusory](https://community.fibery.io/u/Illusory)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2024, 1:31pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/feature-request-claude-ai/6624/1 "2024-09-11T13:31:34Z")

</div>

We highly prefer [Claude](https://claude.ai)’s results over ChatGPT. Would be amazing to see the option to use this model instead of OpenAI.

Related:

> [@Claude API by Anthropic alongside OpenAI API](https://community.fibery.io/t/claude-api-by-anthropic-alongside-openai-api/4876):
>
> Dear Fibery team, Thank you for creating such an innovative and unique product! I wanted to suggest integrating the Claude API by Anthropic as an additional AI option alongside OpenAI. Based on various reports and my own experience, Claude tends to offer better performance, especially for non-English languages and more affordable pricing.

> [@Fibery AI models](https://community.fibery.io/t/fibery-ai-models/6325/3):
>
> I don’t have a lot of specifics to share for use-cases, but I can say I have definitely found some important differences between AI companies/models. For example Anthropic’s Claude is much better at some things like summarizing articles and other large texts vs. ChatGPT (at least with basic prompting and not spending a lot of time trying to make it do what I want). So I can’t help but wonder if having Claude available in Fibery might not give better results (I don’t know what models are currentl…