# \[DONE\] Required fields

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/done-required-fields/2011>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Created:** [September 13, 2021, 12:30pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-required-fields/2011 "2021-09-13T12:30:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dimitri\_S](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/dimitri_s/32/1683_2.png) [@Dimitri\_S](https://community.fibery.io/u/Dimitri_S)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2022, 3:37pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-required-fields/2011/13 "2022-02-28T15:37:17Z")

</div>

I think field specific highlighting (that overrides color coding) would be a must for this type of validation, otherwise it would a) complicate/collide with existing color coding and b) be ambiguous to identify what’s causing the failed validation

As a bonus, field specific highlighting (to indicate required columns, for example) would also allow for adding another feature of [making it easier to differentiate between input and calculated columns](https://community.fibery.io/t/in-table-view-make-it-easier-to-differentiate-between-input-and-calculated-columns/2352) 😉

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-required-fields/2011)._
