# \[DONE\] 🎬 New Apps Creation flow, new getting started flow, new terms

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/done-new-apps-creation-flow-new-getting-started-flow-new-terms/2148>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Created:** [October 26, 2021, 7:00am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-new-apps-creation-flow-new-getting-started-flow-new-terms/2148 "2021-10-26T07:00:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2021, 2:29pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-new-apps-creation-flow-new-getting-started-flow-new-terms/2148/5 "2021-10-26T14:29:55Z")

</div>

Terms are hard 🙂

Here is the relevant research I’ve made

> [@Terminology and App creation flows in ClickUp, Notion, Airtable and Coda](https://community.fibery.io/t/terminology-and-app-creation-flows-in-clickup-notion-airtable-and-coda/2149):
>
> This is a review of several major competitors in terms of conceptual structure (Apps, Types, Views, Pages). The problem with the new waves of no-code collaborative tools is lack of consistent terminology. Fibery Term ClickUp Airtable Notion Coda App → Space Space Base Page Document Type → Database List Table Database Table Document → Page Document - Page Page View View View View View Field Field Field Property Column Relation Relationship Link Relation Lookup View is a com…

> [@rothnic](#):
>
> While I think the table UX to configure Types is a really good approach for the primary UX, I would still consider something like the current UX helpful for more advanced management.

Yes, we are considering to keep it for power users.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-new-apps-creation-flow-new-getting-started-flow-new-terms/2148)._