# \[DONE\] N8n integration

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/done-n8n-integration/1439>\
**Category:** Integrations\
**Created:** [March 11, 2021, 5:22am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-n8n-integration/1439 "2021-03-11T05:22:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yuri\_BC](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/yuri_bc/32/8803_2.png) [@Yuri\_BC](https://community.fibery.io/u/Yuri_BC)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2025, 3:47pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-n8n-integration/1439/10 "2025-05-28T15:47:22Z")

</div>

Yes, I’m very in favor of n8n integration.

…but n8n brings what could partly be covered by, or made easier by, Fibery. **A lot of people use n8n but mostly tech-savvy workflow designers.**  
I think that the trend is now that **‘normal’ users start to understand and use workflow** s, especially because AI makes that easy, without complex technical setup.

So the whole workflow scene is changing from tech-savvy to end-user-friendly.

**So what is the position of Fibery in this?**  
To me it appears that Fibery is very close to being able to offer n8n-like functionality, because of its relationship and automation architecture. I have indicated this opportunity before, see for example:

- [Improving AI Workflow Tools in Fibery - Fibery AI - Fibery.io Community](https://community.fibery.io/t/improving-ai-workflow-tools-in-fibery/7964)
- [Whiteboard-like Automations Setup/Builder - Ideas & Features - Fibery.io Community](https://community.fibery.io/t/whiteboard-like-automations-setup-builder/6563/4)

As well as what I wrote in June 2024:

> [@Allow drag-drop sorting Rules (similar to drag-drop sorting of Access Templates) \[DONE\]](https://community.fibery.io/t/allow-drag-drop-sorting-rules-similar-to-drag-drop-sorting-of-access-templates-done/6303/1):
>
> Note: With the introduction of Highlights, the next logical step is to make Fibery support better workflows to create and make use of that data.
> 
> I think there are three core features of Fibery that drive cycles of intelligent input and output:
> 
> 1. **Data** : Highlights
> 2. **Processes** : Automations (workflows)
> 3. **Insights** : AI Workspace Data Expert
> 
> The Automations feature is in my opinion underdeveloped at this stage.

So with ‘Automation feature underdeloped’ I mean that:

- Old paradigm: Automations are created by admins (mostly)
- New paradigm: end users want and have easy chaining of actions.

So this goes beyond n8n (although n8n is catching up to make it easier too for end users)

I mentioned recently:

> [@What if AI Chat was a field? Or an automation where builder can make their own AI Chat embedded where needed?](https://community.fibery.io/t/what-if-ai-chat-was-a-field-or-an-automation-where-builder-can-make-their-own-ai-chat-embedded-where-needed/8844/7):
>
> So the Smart Agent that Fibery now is building could do a lot, but I think that the management and control of the chained Smart Agent calls is more interesting for Fibery users.

**So there is still a gap between:**

- 
  1. either “Big Smart Agent” does it all for you, or “Space templates” (both are opnionated and give less control)

**..and:**

- 
  1. Automations (currently only for tech savvy people or admins)

That gap is to be filled by Fibery with what I hope is a **graphical n8n-like interface to easily create workflows**. It would perfectly fit Fibery to offer that, and it does not have to be as complex as n8n.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-n8n-integration/1439)._