# \[DONE\] Mobile Apps (Apple, Android) **URL:** \ **Category:** Mobile\ **Tags:** mobile\ **Created:** [September 16, 2020, 9:25pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-mobile-apps-apple-android/985 "2020-09-16T21:25:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 19
**Author:** ![Oshyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/oshyan/32/11431_2.png) [@Oshyan](https://community.fibery.io/u/Oshyan)\ **Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 11:41pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-mobile-apps-apple-android/985/19 "2022-10-30T23:41:57Z")
I assume you’ve tried the existing Mobile Web version (i.e. through a web browser)? It’s actually not bad, just a tad slow ([probably depending on your phone’s JavaScript performance). And of course no offline support. But I’ve been pleasantly surprised. I’m pretty sure you can most of what you outline above. > [@Darb](#): > > If Fibery can’t produce a mobile App, then maybe an integration with another App might resolve the issue. Maybe a 2 Way sync of tasks with Sunsama or Taskade or Todoist or TickTick. All of these provide various aspects of Task Management with mobile Apps. This is a pretty interesting idea actually. I have previously requested this more broadly: [Bi-directional integrations/sync](https://community.fibery.io/t/bi-directional-integrations-sync/1691) But I was primarily thinking of wanting to write _from_ Fibery back to the other tools and I didn’t even think of the potential additional utility there of being able to edit certain data via other tools that have dedicated mobile apps. This reminds me of how Obsidian did things before they had their own mobile app, and it worked actually quite well. And hey, any additional support for bi-directional integrations is something I can get behind. 😁 --- _[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-mobile-apps-apple-android/985)._