# \[DONE\] Many-to-many relationships should be usable for levels in lists

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Tags:** list-view\
**Created:** [May 13, 2021, 4:29pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624 "2021-05-13T16:29:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Matt\_Blais](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/matt_blais/32/1464_2.png) [@Matt\_Blais](https://community.fibery.io/u/Matt_Blais)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2021, 5:57pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624/5 "2021-05-24T17:57:41Z")

</div>

I don’t understand why there must be the limitation that lower-levels of a hierarchical list cannot also be recursive/hierarchical, when the entities adhere to a strict tree structure:

Here is a my hierarchical list:  
 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/e/e7f19decb992e6589dc5710c4db7c7a852fbca0e.png)

The “Page” type is self-referential with a strict parent-child relationship (1:many):  
 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/d/d19a4bbbb84469e44c8b5bf0f74d66dbd1d57853.png)

I don’t understand why, in this situation, where Pages are always organized in a strict tree, the Page entities cannot be displayed as a hierarchy. You simply need to start with all the pages that have no parent.

It would be extremely useful! Otherwise I see no way to automatically generate a hierarchical list of a Project’s Pages, for every Project.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624)._
