# \[DONE\] Many-to-many relationships should be usable for levels in lists

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Tags:** list-view\
**Created:** [May 13, 2021, 4:29pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624 "2021-05-13T16:29:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2021, 7:03pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624/3 "2021-05-23T19:03:32Z")

</div>

> [@CHANGELOG: February 25 / Hierarchical Lists (beta), some improvements](https://community.fibery.io/t/changelog-february-25-hierarchical-lists-beta-some-improvements/1403/20):
>
> My request is to support many to many relationships. In this example I’m only referencing types imported via the JIRA integration. There are no single selects utilized for the JIRA integration iirc. I used the auto-linking to make sure there is an association between the Issue Type and Projects. If there is a work-around of some kind, I’d be interested… I just can’t find one. That is correct, but the suggestion was helpful. I haven’t looked too closely at single selects mainly because I’ve s…

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-many-to-many-relationships-should-be-usable-for-levels-in-lists/1624)._