# \[DONE\] Improve Timeline Readability **URL:** https://community.fibery.io/t/done-improve-timeline-readability/1552 **Category:** Ideas & Features **Tags:** done, timeline-view **Created:** [April 12, 2021, 4:09pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-improve-timeline-readability/1552 "2021-04-12T16:09:31Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 2
### Author: ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp) #### Post date: [April 13, 2021, 4:31am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-improve-timeline-readability/1552/2 "2021-04-13T04:31:52Z")
@rothnic this is great, I am feeling that we have very similar needs from Fibery! Could you have a look at this link: > [@Greater zoom levels on Timeline](https://community.fibery.io/t/greater-zoom-levels-on-timeline/748/6): > > I have been playing around with the new Notion timeline and find their “2 week” view useful. So if it wasn’t a huge burden for the product team to add in some more granularity between one week and one month, would love to see that… Also re: timeline while I’m here, would really like to see movement on these requests: This is a big one and would really help with Timeline view, because frequently if I’m looking from a certain perspective I can barely see the description of the entity These t… You’ll see links to three very similar requests around word wrap limitations in Timelines, and also the whole post that link is in has some good stuff related to what you are referring to in timeline. I encourage you to “heart” away on those requests, as apparently that will increase the value of those features in the Fibery backlog, although as @Oshyan and I have discussed, the Fibery team has not come out and explained clearly how they count requests here in the forum. For example, to “hearts” on the initial post get all the value, or do responses with hearts also count? Also, curious about your thoughts here: > [@Secondary date handling in baselines, and other cool uses](https://community.fibery.io/t/secondary-date-handling-in-baselines-and-other-cool-uses/1253): > > I make a lot of use of Timelines and would like to do even more. One thing I have been dreaming of since getting started with Fibery is some kind of baseline handling, or ability to see multiple dates on the timeline from one Entity. Truly outstanding feature and implementation in Target Process so I have been holding out for seeing something similar here! One idea I was wondering about is could you guys have a secondary date that the user could choose when configuring the Timeline, that woul… And the related: > [@Extra depth on Timeline to provide flexible Gantt Solution?](https://community.fibery.io/t/extra-depth-on-timeline-to-provide-flexible-gantt-solution/635): > > Hey guys, Would love to hear from @mdubakov or @antoniokov or any of the team as soon as you guys have a chance on this: I am thinking about how to set up a very flexible Gantt-type solution on the Timeline view and I wanted to ask you guys about this. A great thing about Fibery is that you guys let the user determine which dates are in the Timeline. Most other tools will force you into a “start date” or “due date” on an entity, then that becomes the dates that represent the durations of ent… Having a secondary date on a timeline is very useful. It’s well done in Zenkit: ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/c/c7f66a5950e696595a41940330edca412770572d.jpeg) and your Roadmunk example is also a nice illustration of how bespoke timelines are a must in Product Development. And since Fibery is going big here, we could really use improved Timelines. Finally, this is also a must in my book for Timelines: > [@Dependency Tracking (+ Gantt chart)](https://community.fibery.io/t/gantt-dependency-tracking/1085): > > Hi Guys, This, of course, is a huge, broad subject. But I wanted to get the conversation started as you guys actually have asked for feedback if there’s interest in the feature yourselves!: This is from one of your new tutorials here: [Dependency management | Fibery Help Center](https://help.fibery.io/en/articles/4514556-dependency-management) So to kick things off, I’d love to see a lot of what you had in TargetProcess, like: Due Date extension that would include both an “original” due date, and “actual” completion … Sadly, I have zero support on that one, but I remain in bad need of dependency handling in Fibery. Talk about a basic functionality in Product Development and Task Management. And something most other quality apps have with often advanced feature sets. Cheers! --- _[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-improve-timeline-readability/1552)._