# \[✔️ DONE\] "Home" and "End" buttons don't work + Deep discussion about quality, traction, features, life and death

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/done-home-and-end-buttons-dont-work-deep-discussion-about-quality-traction-features-life-and-death/1102>\
**Category:** Get Help\
**Created:** [October 26, 2020, 3:41pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-home-and-end-buttons-dont-work-deep-discussion-about-quality-traction-features-life-and-death/1102 "2020-10-26T15:41:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 37

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2021, 1:07pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-home-and-end-buttons-dont-work-deep-discussion-about-quality-traction-features-life-and-death/1102/37 "2021-05-28T13:07:33Z")

</div>

> [@Oshyan](#):
>
> While I agree with most of your reply here, I just want to highlight that I think this is an unfair interpretation of why Michael posted that. It’s data. It’s something relevant that they tested. It adds information to the conversation. He presented it without any other kind of apparent (to me) criticism or bias

Always good to get your input! However, I think we’re going to disagree on this one. That graph was dropped in this exchange with no commentary whatsoever. Reminds me of sometimes getting an annoying text from somebody with an image only - the old “I told you so.” I think it’s here expressly to point out that Features, not Usability, which I am asking for, is the desire of the “community” - and of course that’s a twitter poll, not one here in Discourse, which is convenient because it’s specific audience asked the question, one that has a different dynamic. Michael could have easily added some of his own commentary, but he didn’t. Maybe he will now in another defensive response to me, and then go on a storm of responses to unaddressed requests, which again happens periodically in response to a “complaining” post I make. Perhaps we’d get some acknowledgement of a series of unaddressed requests in this forum such as the one regarding [quoting](https://community.fibery.io/t/quote-text-in-comments-for-better-formatted-responses/1657)! , which you and I have discussed; is a fundamental of most competitors; and is a real pain in Fibery - have you tried to consistently use the “quote” functionality around text, in comments where it’s most needed?

@oshyan and @Matt_Blais are echoing my sentiment. I don’t think the regular WIP in Twitter, and some more discussion in a monthly blog, is near enough, when there are hordes of unaddressed items in this discourse forum which Fibery itself encourages people to use!

> [@rothnic](#):
>
> The lack of the ability for Fibery itself to provide that is what I was highlighting. Otherwise, we don’t even know if an issue has been captured in many cases, and you have to bump discourse threads for updates on status.

This is so true! I have spent so much time trying to keep track of unaddressed requests so I can try to bump them, but over the last year or so I have all but given up as most of them remain dangling in the wind and it’s just a waste of time to try to get Fibery to address them…

There are a few requests guys about getting a proper voting / feature ranking system in here

> [@Suggestion: motorway Canny or other alternative for roadmap/feature requests](https://community.fibery.io/t/suggestion-canny-or-other-alternative-for-roadmap-feature-requests/1165/2):
>
> Hi! You can share your Feature requests here [Suggest Ideas - Fibery Community](https://community.fibery.io/c/feature-requests/7) - every topic is checked by our team and linked to our current backlog via [Highlights](https://help.fibery.io/en/articles/4455989-bi-directional-hypertext-links-in-fibery) Сommunity feedback is on an equal footing with private intercom chats, interviews, and conversations feedback. This is how our requests tracker looked a week ago, for example slight_smile But this is smth we have now - I’ve noted your suggestion and who knows, maybe someday we will add Feature Votin…

> [@Quote Text in Comments for better formatted responses](https://community.fibery.io/t/quote-text-in-comments-for-better-formatted-responses/1657):
>
> Hi, I’d like to request the ability to highlight text in a comment, and have the option to include it within a response to that comment. This is a feature of systems like Wrike… ClickUp… [Making a threaded comment in task view] and even here in Discourse - which actually will create a new response at the same time, including the quote. I know @Oshyan supports this, and it would be a great solution to the pending feature of [Threaded Comments](https://community.fibery.io/t/planned-threads-in-comments/1049)

Of course, the Fibery team hasn’t bothered to consolidate them, so I’d suggest voting on both. Not that you’ll be able to know how much influence that has, since we have no clear guidance from Fibery about how they count votes in the forum (is it “hearts” on the initial post, or total within a post?), although it’s been asked that they address that.

And perhaps continued voices in the community will help move this agenda along, because Michael has decided for now that he won’t accept “raw votes,” even though many world-class tools use that measure.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-home-and-end-buttons-dont-work-deep-discussion-about-quality-traction-features-life-and-death/1102)._
