# \[DONE\] Entity-level permissions

**URL:** <https://community.fibery.io/t/done-entity-level-permissions/2163>\
**Category:** Ideas & Features\
**Tags:** permissions, sharing\
**Created:** [October 29, 2021, 2:32pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-entity-level-permissions/2163 "2021-10-29T14:32:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B\_Sp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@B\_Sp](https://community.fibery.io/u/B_Sp)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2020, 5:09pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-entity-level-permissions/2163/8 "2020-05-19T17:09:43Z")

</div>

Hey Guys, I don’t mean to pile on but since we have some activity here from @julian, I would like to add my vote. I would be happy with Type-level permissions if that was easier. Ultimately, Entity-level is superior.

Just for some context, I really like apps like Wrike, Asana, ClickUp, and some others that will add you as a share/viewer when you comment @ a particular user.

I would also love to see this feature come along at a similar time:

> [@\[DONE\] "Watcher" of an Entity](https://community.fibery.io/t/watcher-of-an-entity-use-the-assignement-extension/563):
>
> Hi guys, I was interested in creating the equivalent functionality of “watcher” that is offered by a lot of PM apps around their tasks and entities. This is a user who is “subscribed” to an entity’s activity - so they are informed when any status changes, fields are adjusted, comments are made, and so forth. Can I use the “assignment” extension to create this functionality? Or would I need to do this another way if that extension needs to be reserved for only actual assignees? Thanks guys!

Thanks guys and keep up the great work!

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-entity-level-permissions/2163)._
