# \[DONE\] Complexer Logic in filters **URL:** \ **Category:** Ideas & Features\ **Tags:** filter\ **Created:** [August 28, 2020, 10:38am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932 "2020-08-28T10:38:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 9\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![AndreasHe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a3d4f5/32.png) [@AndreasHe](https://community.fibery.io/u/AndreasHe)\ **Post date:** [August 28, 2020, 10:38am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/1 "2020-08-28T10:38:54Z")
![2020-08-28 12_34_50-Backlog By sdsds _ Fibery](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/3/35a6f194f65177e825f33521b817b44f765db448.png) Require a more complex filter way (not only “all” or “any”). The logic behind the screenshot comment is not possible to be used. IMHO is the JIRA query way great as you can add anything imagineable. ---
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [August 28, 2020, 12:50pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/2 "2020-08-28T12:50:13Z")
@AndreasHe You can solve this problem using “is any of” filter, like this ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/5/5db77b3179450ba8f9d300c9c286e971d6975381.png) ---
**Author:** ![Nevil\_Hulspas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/nevil_hulspas/32/4703_2.png) [@Nevil\_Hulspas](https://community.fibery.io/u/Nevil_Hulspas)\ **Post date:** [March 6, 2022, 8:19pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/3 "2022-03-06T20:19:34Z")
We would love the ability to set filter groups, similar to Notion. ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/e/ebe4a5ba7eda23d7ac6c47b1b8e83703a087ae0b.png) This way we can make even better / more specific views which improves productivity. ---
**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\ **Post date:** [March 6, 2022, 9:18pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/4 "2022-03-06T21:18:08Z")
Same request? > [@\[DONE\] Complexer Logic in filters](https://community.fibery.io/t/complexer-logic-in-filters/932): > > [2020-08-28 12\_34\_50-Backlog By sdsds \_ Fibery] Require a more complex filter way (not only “all” or “any”). The logic behind the screenshot comment is not possible to be used. IMHO is the JIRA query way great as you can add anything imagineable. ---
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [March 9, 2022, 7:53am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/5 "2022-03-09T07:53:14Z")
This specific filter can be created using “is any of” operator ![Screenshot 2022-03-09 at 9.52.32 AM](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/fibery/original/2X/2/2407dc4a0845e08980761f0827b9018253ac3335.png) Do you have other cases? ---
**Author:** ![Nevil\_Hulspas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/nevil_hulspas/32/4703_2.png) [@Nevil\_Hulspas](https://community.fibery.io/u/Nevil_Hulspas)\ **Post date:** [April 10, 2022, 9:09pm UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/6 "2022-04-10T21:09:00Z")
“Is any of” is basically only a OR operator on the root level. But we want the ability to group filters, so that we can filter more complex in deeper levels. See screenshot that I shared. The topic that @Chr1sG shared above is the same as my request, so they can be merged. Notion already has this feature, that is where my screenshot comes from. ---
**Author:** ![julien.erny](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/julien.erny/32/5833_2.png) [@julien.erny](https://community.fibery.io/u/julien.erny)\ **Post date:** [December 15, 2022, 9:42am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/7 "2022-12-15T09:42:48Z")
I strongly second this idea since a lot of common use-cases are not covered with the current way to do it: (Condition A OR Condition B) AND Condition C Even with De Morgan laws to convert everything in AND or OR, you still need group negations ---
**Author:** ![mdubakov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/mdubakov/32/10_2.png) [@mdubakov](https://community.fibery.io/u/mdubakov)\ **Post date:** [April 14, 2023, 9:08am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/8 "2023-04-14T09:08:56Z")
Implemented in latest release > [@April 13, 2023 / Nested filters and color coding, relation sorts](https://community.fibery.io/t/april-13-2023-nested-filters-and-color-coding-relation-sorts/4312): > > nesting_dolls Nested filter groups [filters-groups] Previously, you had to choose whether all filters should be combined with and or with or. For any complex condition involving the combination of two, we suggested creating an auxiliary Formula as a workaround grimacing. With filter groups, you can combine the logical operators in any way you like: We’ve updated our [guide on Filters](https://the.fibery.io/@public/User_Guide/Guide/Filters-141) to reflect the new powers. art Advanced color coding The sam… ---
**Author:** ![Chr1sG](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.fibery.io/chr1sg/32/3941_2.png) [@Chr1sG](https://community.fibery.io/u/Chr1sG)\ **Post date:** [October 4, 2024, 6:30am UTC](https://community.fibery.io/t/done-complexer-logic-in-filters/932/9 "2024-10-04T06:30:28Z")